| Acknowledgements | 第4-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5-6页 |
| 摘要 | 第7-10页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第10-15页 |
| 1.1 Background of the Study | 第10-11页 |
| 1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study | 第11-12页 |
| 1.3 Research Questions | 第12页 |
| 1.4 Data and Methodology | 第12-13页 |
| 1.5 Organization of the Thesis | 第13-15页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第15-20页 |
| 2.1 Previous Studies of | 第15-16页 |
| 2.2 Previous Studies of "And" | 第16-18页 |
| 2.3 Previous Comparative Studies on "He" and "And" | 第18-19页 |
| 2.4 The Summary of Previous Studies | 第19-20页 |
| Chapter Three Theoretical Framework | 第20-28页 |
| 3.1 Hengeveld's Amsterdam Model | 第21-24页 |
| 3.2 Word-class System in Chinese | 第24-28页 |
| Chapter Four Comparison on Syntactic Features of "He (和)" and "And" | 第28-64页 |
| 4.1 Syntactic Features of "He" | 第28-48页 |
| 4.1.1 "He" as a Preposition | 第28-36页 |
| 4.1.2 "He" as a Conjunction | 第36-48页 |
| 4.2 Syntactic Features of "And" | 第48-57页 |
| 4.3 Comparison on Syntactic Features between "He" and "And" | 第57-64页 |
| Chapter Five Summary | 第64-68页 |
| 5.1 Major Findings of the Study | 第64-66页 |
| 5.2 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Research | 第66-68页 |
| Works Cited | 第68-72页 |
| Publications | 第72页 |
