| 摘要 | 第4-6页 |
| Abstract | 第6-7页 |
| Introduction | 第10-16页 |
| 0.1 Research Background | 第10-13页 |
| 0.2 Research Questions | 第13页 |
| 0.3 Research Significance | 第13-14页 |
| 0.4 Structure of the Thesis | 第14-16页 |
| Chapter One Literature Review | 第16-22页 |
| 1.1 Studies on English Versions of the Play from the Intertextual Perspective | 第16-18页 |
| 1.2 Studies on English Versions of the Play from other Perspectives | 第18-20页 |
| 1.3 Limitation of Previous Studies and Necessity of this Study | 第20-22页 |
| Chapter Two Theoretical Framework | 第22-30页 |
| 2.1 Translation as Rewriting under Manipulation | 第22-24页 |
| 2.2 The Three Manipulative Factors in Andre Lefevere’s Manipulation Theory | 第24-30页 |
| 2.2.1 Translation and Ideology | 第24-26页 |
| 2.2.2 Translation and Poetics | 第26-27页 |
| 2.2.3 Translation and Patronage | 第27-30页 |
| Chapter Three A Comparative Study of the Two Versions of The Peony Pavilion under Manipulation Framework | 第30-64页 |
| 3.1 Ideological Manipulation in Two Versions of The Peony Pavilion | 第30-44页 |
| 3.1.1 Manipulation in the Choice of the Source Text | 第30-33页 |
| 3.1.2 Ideological Manipulation in the Process of Translation | 第33-38页 |
| 3.1.3 Manipulation in the Acceptabilityof the translated Versions by the Target Social System | 第38-44页 |
| 3.2 Poetological Manipulation in Two Versions of The Peony Pavilion | 第44-58页 |
| 3.2.1 Poetological Manipulation in Lexicon | 第44-49页 |
| 3.2.2 Poetological Manipulation in Syntax | 第49-53页 |
| 3.2.3 Poetological Manipulation in Literary Styles | 第53-58页 |
| 3.3 Manipulation of Patronage in Two Versions of The Peony Pavilion | 第58-64页 |
| 3.3.1 Ideological Infuence on the Translators | 第58-60页 |
| 3.3.2 Economical Motivation of the Patrons | 第60-62页 |
| 3.3.3 The Assurance of Translators’ Statuses | 第62-64页 |
| Chapter Four Translation Methods Applied in the Rewriting Process of the Two Versions under Manipulation Framework | 第64-72页 |
| 4.1 Amplification vs. Omission | 第64-68页 |
| 4.2 Division vs. Combination | 第68-72页 |
| Chapter Five Conclusion | 第72-76页 |
| 5.1 Major Findings of This Study | 第72-74页 |
| 5.2 Limitations of This Study | 第74页 |
| 5.3 Implications of this Study | 第74-76页 |
| Bibliography | 第76-80页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第80-81页 |
| 个人简历 | 第81页 |