| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 第5-6页 |
| ABSTRACT | 第6页 |
| 摘要 | 第7-11页 |
| LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS | 第11-14页 |
| CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION | 第14-20页 |
| 1.1 Research Background | 第14-15页 |
| 1.2 Research Objectives and Research Issues | 第15-16页 |
| 1.3 Research Conception | 第16-17页 |
| 1.4 Research Methodology | 第17-18页 |
| 1.5 Significance of the Present Study | 第18页 |
| 1.6 Organization of the Thesis | 第18-20页 |
| CHAPTER TWO RELEVANT STUDIES ON LIHECI FROM THE PERSPECTIVEOF LINGUISTICS, CFL TEACHING, AND LEXICOGRAPHY | 第20-32页 |
| 2.1 Studies from the Perspective of Chinese Linguistics | 第21-26页 |
| 2.1.1 Liheci and Its Grammatical Properties | 第21-23页 |
| 2.1.2 Liheci and Its Classification Principles | 第23页 |
| 2.1.3 Liheci and Its Identification Principles | 第23-24页 |
| 2.1.4 Liheci and Its Extending Modes and Rules | 第24-25页 |
| 2.1.5 Liheci and Its Origin | 第25-26页 |
| 2.1.6 Liheci and Its Pragmatic Use | 第26页 |
| 2.2 Studies from the Perspective of CFL Teaching | 第26-27页 |
| 2.3 Studies from the Perspective of Lexicography | 第27-32页 |
| 2.3.1 Representation of Liheci in MCD | 第28页 |
| 2.3.2 Representation of Liheci in CFLDs | 第28-30页 |
| 2.3.3 Representation of Liheci in Specialized Dictionaries | 第30-32页 |
| CHAPTER THREE CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS ON NATIVES’ USE OF LIHECI | 第32-44页 |
| 3.1 Corpus Analysis Methods | 第32-35页 |
| 3.2 Natives’ Use of Liheci | 第35-41页 |
| 3.2.1 Usage of Verb-object Type | 第35-39页 |
| 3.2.2 Usage of Verb-complement Type | 第39-40页 |
| 3.2.3 Usage of Other Types | 第40-41页 |
| 3.3 Summary | 第41-44页 |
| CHAPTER FOUR CORPUS-BASED ANALYSIS ON CFL LEARNERS’ USE OFLIHECI | 第44-56页 |
| 4.1 Research Methods | 第44-47页 |
| 4.1.1 Method One: Error Analysis | 第45-46页 |
| 4.1.2 Method Two: Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis | 第46-47页 |
| 4.2 Error Analysis of Liheci Based on HSKDCC | 第47-50页 |
| 4.2.1 Errors of the Combined Form of Liheci | 第48-49页 |
| 4.2.2 Errors of the Split Form of Liheci | 第49-50页 |
| 4.3 Possible Causes of Learners’ Errors | 第50-54页 |
| 4.3.1 Negative L1 Transference | 第51-53页 |
| 4.3.2 L2 proficiency | 第53-54页 |
| 4.4 Summary | 第54-56页 |
| CHAPTER FIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE REPRESENTATION OFLIHECI IN DICTIONARIES | 第56-70页 |
| 5.1 Representation of Liheci in Dictionaries | 第56-62页 |
| 5.1.1 Representation of Liheci in MCD | 第56-57页 |
| 5.1.2 Representation of Liheci in DUCCSW | 第57-59页 |
| 5.1.3 Representation of Liheci in CPLDCC | 第59-61页 |
| 5.1.4 Representation of Liheci in CED | 第61-62页 |
| 5.2 Deficiencies of Representation of Liheci in Existing CFLDs | 第62-69页 |
| 5.2.1 Side-effect of Inconsistent Word-collection Principles | 第63-64页 |
| 5.2.2 Inconsistent POS Labeling | 第64-65页 |
| 5.2.3 Insufficient Definition | 第65-67页 |
| 5.2.4 Insufficient Exemplification | 第67-69页 |
| 5.3 Summary | 第69-70页 |
| CHAPTER SIX PROPOSALS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF THE REPRESENTATIONOF LIHECI IN CFLDS | 第70-84页 |
| 6.1 Theoretical Foundation for Optimization | 第70-72页 |
| 6.2 Application of Construction Grammar | 第72-79页 |
| 6.3 Tentative Proposals to Better the Representation of Liheci in CFLDs | 第79-82页 |
| 6.4 Summary | 第82-84页 |
| CHAPTER SEVEN CONCLUSION | 第84-88页 |
| 7.1 Major Findings of the Study | 第84-85页 |
| 7.2 Implications of the Study | 第85-86页 |
| 7.3 Limitation of the Study and Suggestion for Further Research | 第86-88页 |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | 第88-96页 |
| Dictionaries Cited | 第88页 |
| Other Publications | 第88-96页 |
| APPENDICES | 第96-118页 |
| Appendix A | 第96-100页 |
| Appendix B | 第100-107页 |
| Appendix C | 第107-108页 |
| Appendix D | 第108-109页 |
| Appendix E | 第109-112页 |
| Appendix F | 第112-118页 |
