| 摘要 | 第5-6页 |
| Abstract | 第6-7页 |
| Chapter 1 Introduction | 第10-18页 |
| 1.1 Research Background and Purpose | 第10-12页 |
| 1.2 Research Significance | 第12-14页 |
| 1.2.1 Theoretical Meaning | 第13页 |
| 1.2.2 Practical Meaning | 第13-14页 |
| 1.3 Research Content | 第14-16页 |
| 1.3.1 Relevant Concept | 第14-15页 |
| 1.3.2 Object | 第15-16页 |
| 1.3.3 Problems to be Solved | 第16页 |
| 1.4 Research Method | 第16-17页 |
| 1.5 Structure | 第17-18页 |
| Chapter 2 Literature Review | 第18-30页 |
| 2.1 Studies on Cooperative Principle | 第18-22页 |
| 2.1.1 Previous Studies of CP | 第18-20页 |
| 2.1.2 Problems in Research of CP | 第20-21页 |
| 2.1.3 Prospect of the Research of CP | 第21-22页 |
| 2.2 Studies on Pragmatic Presupposition | 第22-28页 |
| 2.2.1 Properties of Pragmatic Presupposition | 第22-23页 |
| 2.2.2 Applied Research on Pragmatic Presupposition | 第23-28页 |
| 2.3 Studies on Official Responses in Press Conferences | 第28-30页 |
| 2.3.1 Study of Language Vagueness in Press Conferences | 第28页 |
| 2.3.2 Comprehensive Study of Pragmatic Strategies in Press Conference | 第28-29页 |
| 2.3.3 Research from Other Aspects | 第29-30页 |
| Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework | 第30-38页 |
| 3.1 Conversational Implicature Theory | 第30-34页 |
| 3.1.1 Classic Grice's Conversational Implicature Theory | 第30-33页 |
| 3.1.2 New Grice's Conversational Implicature Theory | 第33-34页 |
| 3.2 Fictitious Pragmatic Presupposition Theory | 第34-38页 |
| 3.2.1 Definition of Fictitious Pragmatic Presupposition | 第34-35页 |
| 3.2.2 Classification of Pragmatic Presupposition | 第35-38页 |
| Chapter 4 Pragmatic Analysis of Responses to Fictitious PragmaticPresuppositions in Chinese and American Press Conferences | 第38-70页 |
| 4.1 Main Realization Ways of Fictitious Pragmatic Presuppositions in Official PressConferences | 第38-41页 |
| 4.1.1 Breaking Information Flow in Discourses | 第38-39页 |
| 4.1.2 Applying Pragmatic Vagueness | 第39-40页 |
| 4.1.3 Inducing the Spokesman to Misunderstand Conversation Intention | 第40-41页 |
| 4.2 Response Strategies Used in Chinese and American Press Conferences Aimed at FictitiousPragmatic Presupposition | 第41-63页 |
| 4.2.1 Cooperative Strategy | 第42-47页 |
| 4.2.2 Evasive Strategy | 第47-53页 |
| 4.2.3 Euphemism Strategy | 第53-58页 |
| 4.2.4 Vague Strategy | 第58-63页 |
| 4.3 Causes of Using Different Response Strategies in Official Press Conferences Aimed atFictitious Pragmatic Presupposition | 第63-70页 |
| 4.3.1 Reflecting Different Ideologies | 第65-66页 |
| 4.3.2 Complying with National Interests | 第66-68页 |
| 4.3.3 Being Deeply Influenced by Different Traditional Cultures | 第68-70页 |
| Chapter 5 Conclusion | 第70-73页 |
| 5.1 Major Findings | 第70-71页 |
| 5.2 Implications | 第71页 |
| 5.3 Limitations of the Research and Suggestions for Further Researches | 第71-73页 |
| Bibliography | 第73-77页 |
| Acknowledgement | 第77-78页 |
| 个人简介 | 第78-79页 |
| 作者攻读硕士学位期间取得的学术成果目录 | 第79页 |
