| Acknowledgements | 第5-6页 |
| Abstract | 第6-7页 |
| 摘要 | 第8-11页 |
| Chapter Ⅰ Introduction | 第11-17页 |
| 1.1 Background of the Study | 第11-14页 |
| 1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study | 第14-15页 |
| 1.3 Layout of the Thesis | 第15-17页 |
| Chapter Ⅱ Literature Review | 第17-27页 |
| 2.1 Previous Studies on Political Publicity Texts | 第17-21页 |
| 2.1.1 Features of Political Publicity Texts | 第17-19页 |
| 2.1.2 Chinese Government White Papers | 第19-21页 |
| 2.2 Previous Studies on Political Publicity Texts Translation | 第21-27页 |
| 2.2.1 Most Frequently-used Theoretical Frameworks | 第22-23页 |
| 2.2.2 Features of Political Publicity Texts Translation | 第23-24页 |
| 2.2.3 Political Publicity Texts Translation and Ideology | 第24-27页 |
| Chapter Ⅲ Theoretical Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis | 第27-41页 |
| 3.1 Critical Discourse Analysis and its Application to Translation Studies | 第27-30页 |
| 3.2 Fairclough's Three-Dimensional Framework-The Theoretical Foundation of CDA | 第30-32页 |
| 3.3 Systemic Functional Grammar-The Analytical Tool of CDA | 第32-41页 |
| 3.3.1 Ideational Metafunction | 第33-35页 |
| 3.3.2 Interpersonal Metafunction | 第35-39页 |
| 3.3.3 Textual Metafunction | 第39-41页 |
| Chapter Ⅳ A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Government White Paper Diaoyu Dao,anInherent Territory of China and its English Translation | 第41-71页 |
| 4.1 Rationale for Selecting the Present Sample | 第41-42页 |
| 4.2 Textual Analysis | 第42-68页 |
| 4.2.1 Transitivity | 第43-47页 |
| 4.2.1.1 Methods and Findings | 第43-45页 |
| 4.2.1.2 Discussion | 第45-47页 |
| 4.2.2 Lexical Classification | 第47-57页 |
| 4.2.2.1 Lexical Choices Concerning Japan | 第48-50页 |
| 4.2.2.2 Lexical Choices Concerning China | 第50-53页 |
| 4.2.2.3 Lexical Choices Concerning Diaoyu Dao | 第53-54页 |
| 4.2.2.4 Lexical Choices Concerning the United States | 第54-57页 |
| 4.2.3 Nominalization | 第57-60页 |
| 4.2.3.1 Nominalizations of Japan's and the United States' Actions | 第57-58页 |
| 4.2.3.2 Nominalizations of China's Actions | 第58-60页 |
| 4.2.4 Modality | 第60-64页 |
| 4.2.5 Thematic Structure | 第64-68页 |
| 4.3 Social Practice Analysis | 第68-71页 |
| Chapter Ⅴ Conclusion | 第71-75页 |
| 5.1 Major Findings and Implications of the Present Study | 第71-72页 |
| 5.2 Limitations of the Present Study | 第72-73页 |
| 5.3 Suggestions for Further Study | 第73-75页 |
| References | 第75-81页 |
| Appendices | 第81-103页 |
| Appendix Ⅰ《钓鱼岛是中国的固有领土》 | 第81-88页 |
| Appendix Ⅱ Diaoyu Dao, an Inherent Territory of China | 第88-102页 |
| Appendix Ⅲ Nominalizations of the Moves Taken by Japan and the United States on Diaoyu Dao | 第102-103页 |
