首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--语文教学论文--教学法论文

英语专业校本课程方案对比研究—设置、实施和效果

Abstract第8-9页
摘要第10-13页
Chapter One Introduction第13-18页
    1.1 Backgrounds of the Study第13-14页
    1.2 Statement of the Problem第14-15页
    1.3 Purpose and Method of the Study第15页
    1.4 Significance of the Study第15-16页
    1.5 Organization of the Thesis第16-18页
Chapter Two Literature Review第18-36页
    2.1 Introduction第18页
    2.2 Definitions of Curriculum第18-20页
    2.3 Principles for Curriculum Design第20-22页
    2.4 Studies on Curriculum Design for Language Education第22-24页
    2.5 Studies on Curriculum Design for Chinese English-major Students第24-26页
    2.6 Studies on Curriculum Reform for English Majors in the Chinese Context第26-28页
    2.7 Studies Related to Two National Guidelines for English-major Education第28-33页
        2.7.1 English Teaching Syllabus for English Majors第28-30页
        2.7.2 The New National Standards for English-major Undergraduate Education第30-33页
    2.8 Research Gaps and Research Questions第33-35页
    2.9 Chapter Summary第35-36页
Chapter Three Methodology第36-46页
    3.1 Introduction第36页
    3.2 Participants第36-37页
    3.3 The Two Curricula Involved第37-38页
    3.4 Sources of Data第38-41页
        3.4.1 Questionnaire Survey第38-40页
        3.4.2 Semi-structured Interviews第40页
        3.4.3 Classroom Observations第40-41页
    3.5 Data Collection Procedure第41-43页
        3.5.1 Administrating the Questionnaires第41页
        3.5.2 Interviewing the Participants第41-42页
        3.5.3 Conducting Classroom Observation第42-43页
    3.6 Data Analysis第43-45页
        3.6.1 Analyzing the Questionnaires第43-44页
        3.6.2 Analyzing the Interviews第44页
        3.6.3 Analyzing the Classroom Observations第44-45页
    3.7 Chapter Summary第45-46页
Chapter Four Results and Discussion第46-81页
    4.1 Introduction第46页
    4.2 Design of the Two Curricula第46-51页
        4.2.1 Curriculum A第46-48页
        4.2.2 Curriculum B第48-50页
        4.2.3 A Comparison of the Two Curricula第50-51页
    4.3 Implementation of the Two Curricula第51-57页
        4.3.1 Courses Offered第51-53页
        4.3.2 Teacher Resources第53-54页
        4.3.3 Learning Materials第54-56页
        4.3.4 Modes of Assessment第56-57页
    4.4 Outcomes of Two Curricula第57-74页
        4.4.1 Language Proficiency第57-61页
        4.4.2 Knowledge Domain第61-65页
        4.4.3 Overall Quality第65-69页
        4.4.4 Practical Skills第69-71页
        4.4.5 Classroom Performance第71-73页
        4.4.6 TEM-4 Scores第73-74页
    4.5 Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages of the Two Curricula第74-80页
        4.5.1 Advantages第75-77页
        4.5.2 Disadvantages第77-80页
    4.6 Summary第80-81页
Chapter Five Conclusion第81-86页
    5.1 Summary of the Study第81-83页
    5.2 Implications of the Study第83-84页
    5.3 Limitations of the Study第84页
    5.4 Suggestions for Future Studies第84-86页
References第86-91页
Appendix Ⅰ第91-98页
Appendix Ⅱ第98-103页
Appendix Ⅲ第103-104页
Appendix Ⅳ第104-105页
Acknowledgements第105-106页
学位论文评阅及答辩情况表第106页

论文共106页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:山东论坛(2016)网站翻译项目实践报告--从模因论看外宣翻译
下一篇:顺应论视角下《唐顿庄园》中的反语研究