| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 第5-6页 |
| ABSTRACT | 第6-7页 |
| 摘要 | 第8-11页 |
| CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION | 第11-17页 |
| 1.1 Research Background | 第11-12页 |
| 1.2 Definition of Courtroom Discourses | 第12-13页 |
| 1.3 Rationale of This Study | 第13-14页 |
| 1.4 Research Questions | 第14页 |
| 1.5 Methodology and Data | 第14-15页 |
| 1.6 Organization of This Study | 第15-17页 |
| CHAPTER TWO LTERATURE REVIEW | 第17-22页 |
| 2.1 Domestic Researches on This Study | 第17-19页 |
| 2.1.1 Previous Researches on Courtroom Discourses | 第17-18页 |
| 2.1.2 Previous Researches on The WY Case | 第18-19页 |
| 2.2 Overseas Researches on This Study | 第19-21页 |
| 2.2.1 Previous Researches on Courtroom Discourse | 第19-21页 |
| 2.3 Critical Evaluation | 第21-22页 |
| CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK | 第22-30页 |
| 3.1 An Overview of Critical Discourse Analysis | 第22-23页 |
| 3.2 Fairclough’s Three-Dimension Framework for Discourse Analysis | 第23-29页 |
| 3.2.1 The Text Dimension: Description | 第24-26页 |
| 3.2.2 The Discursive Dimension: Interpretation | 第26-28页 |
| 3.2.3 The Social Practice Dimension: Explanation | 第28-29页 |
| 3.3 Analytical Framework | 第29-30页 |
| CHAPTER FOUR ATTITUDES EXPRESSED BY PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT TOWARDSTHE IDENTIFICATION OF FRAUDULENT FUND-RAISING | 第30-36页 |
| 4.1 Appraisal Resources Description of Discourses Generated by Prosecutor | 第30-33页 |
| 4.2 Appraisal Resources Description of Discourses Generated by Defendant | 第33-36页 |
| CHAPTER FIVE PRAGMATIC STRATEGIES EMPLOYED BY BOTH PARTIES TO PERFORMTHEIR RIGHTS OF SPEECH | 第36-39页 |
| 5.1 Pragmatic Strategies Employed by Prosecutor | 第36-37页 |
| 5.2 Pragmatic Strategies Employed by Defendant | 第37-39页 |
| CHAPTER SIX SOCIAL-CULTURAL FACTORS THAT SHAPE THE LINGUISTIC DIFFERENCESPRESENTED BY PROSECUTOR AND DEFENDANT | 第39-55页 |
| 6.1 Institutional Context | 第39-42页 |
| 6.1.1 The Appraisal Stance | 第39-40页 |
| 6.1.2 The Emotional Stance | 第40-41页 |
| 6.1.3 The Epistemic Stance | 第41页 |
| 6.1.4 The Alignment/Disalignment Stance | 第41-42页 |
| 6.2 Situational Context | 第42-52页 |
| 6.2.1 Controversies about the Conviction | 第42-47页 |
| 6.2.2 Controversies about the Measurement of Penalty | 第47-52页 |
| 6.3 Social Context | 第52-55页 |
| CHAPTER SEVEN CONCLUSION | 第55-59页 |
| 7.1 Major Findings | 第55-57页 |
| 7.2 Implications | 第57页 |
| 7.3 Limitations | 第57-58页 |
| 7.4 Suggestions for Further Study | 第58-59页 |
| REFERENCES | 第59-61页 |
