| Abstract | 第5页 |
| 1． Introduction | 第7-10页 |
| 2． Translation Studies Based on Literary Theories | 第10-16页 |
| 2．1． Literature as a Special Use of Language | 第10-14页 |
| 2．1．1． Russian Formalism | 第10-11页 |
| 2．1．2． Standard Language and Literary Language | 第11-12页 |
| 2．1．3． The Weakness of the Formal Method | 第12-14页 |
| 2．2 Literature as Value Judgments | 第14-16页 |
| 2．2．1． I． A． Richards' Experiment | 第14页 |
| 2．2．2． Literary Conventions | 第14-16页 |
| 3． Theories of Literary Translation | 第16-24页 |
| 3．1． Chinese Translators' Views on What is to Translate | 第16-19页 |
| 3．1．1． Literary Translation in the Late Qing Dynasty | 第16页 |
| 3．1．2． Literary Translation in the Early 20th Century | 第16-17页 |
| 3．1．3． Modern Theories of Literary Translation | 第17-19页 |
| 3．2． Western Theories of Literary Translation | 第19-24页 |
| 3．2．1． Peter Newmark's Theory of Literary Translation | 第20-21页 |
| 3．2．2． Functional Approach to Literary Translation | 第21-22页 |
| 3．2．3． The Formal Distortion of the Source Text | 第22-24页 |
| 4． Literary Translation Based on Linguistic Analysis | 第24-37页 |
| 4．1． Features of the Source Text--The Dead | 第25-26页 |
| 4．2． Comparative Studies of Three Chinese Versions of The Dead | 第26-34页 |
| 4．2．1． Foreignness: Limits of Translation into Chinese | 第26-29页 |
| 4．2．2 Familiarity: Excessive Use of Chinese Idioms | 第29-30页 |
| 4．2．3 Dissimilation: Preservation of the Syntactic Structure | 第30-32页 |
| 4．2．4． Readers'Conceptions | 第32-34页 |
| 4．3 Conclusions | 第34-37页 |
| 4．3．1． Literariness Decided by the Value of the Source Text | 第35页 |
| 4．3．2． Literariness Embodied in the Features of the Target Language | 第35-37页 |
| 5． Literary Translation Based on Value Judgments | 第37-42页 |
| 5．1． Lefevere's Theories of Translation | 第38-39页 |
| 5．2． Literary Code of China in the 1970s | 第39-41页 |
| 5．3． Joyce's Recognition in China in the 1980s | 第41-42页 |
| 6． Conclusion | 第42-44页 |
| Bibliography | 第44-47页 |
