首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--写作、修辞论文--翻译论文

Coping with Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failures in Liaison Interpreting from the Perspective of Conversational Principles

ACKNOWLEGEMENTS第7-8页
Abstract第8页
摘要第9-12页
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION第12-16页
    1.1 Research Background第12-13页
    1.2 Purpose and Significance第13-14页
    1.3 Method and Thesis Structure第14-16页
CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW第16-20页
    2.1 Pragmatic Failure第16-17页
    2.2 Conversational Principles第17-18页
    2.3 Cross-Cultural Communications第18-20页
CHAPTER III ANALYSIS OF TYPICAL CASES OF PRAGMATIC FAILURES第20-30页
    3.1 Classification of Pragmatic Failures第20-22页
        3.1.1 Pragma-Linguistic Failures第20-21页
        3.1.2 Socio-Pragmatic Failures第21页
        3.1.3 Comparison of the Two Types第21-22页
    3.2 Cases Analyzed from Maxims of Cooperation Principle第22-26页
        3.2.1 Quality Maxim第22-23页
        3.2.2 Quantity Maxim第23-24页
        3.2.3 Relation Maxim第24页
        3.2.4 Manner Maxim第24-26页
    3.3 Cases Analyzed from Maxims of Politeness Principle第26-30页
        3.3.1 Approbation Maxim第27页
        3.3.2 Sympathy Maxim第27-28页
        3.3.3 Agreement Maxim第28页
        3.3.4 Tact Maxim第28-30页
CHAPTER IV TACTICS TO AVOID CROSS-CULTURAL PRAGMATIC FAILURES IN LIAISON INTERPRETING第30-42页
    4.1 Features of Liaison Interpreting第30-32页
    4.2 Causes of Pragmatic Failure in Liaison Interpreting第32-35页
        4.2.1 Cultural Value第32-33页
        4.2.2 Thinking Pattern第33-34页
        4.2.3 Negative Cultural Transfer第34-35页
    4.3 Coping Tactics to Pragmatic Failures第35-42页
        4.3.1 Development of Interpreter’s Cross-Cultural Competence第35-37页
        4.3.2 Enrichment of Interpreter’s Interpreting Skills第37-39页
        4.3.3 Exertion of Interpreter's Subjectivity第39-42页
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION第42-44页
    5.1 Summary of the Study第42-43页
    5.2 Limitations and Suggestions on Future Studies第43-44页
BIBLIOGRAPHY第44-45页

论文共45页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:Communicative Approach to C-E Museum Commentary Interpreting
下一篇:Interpreting Vague Language in Diplomatic Discourse: a Study from the Functionalist Perspective