首页--语言、文字论文--汉语论文--语义、词汇、词义(训诂学)论文--现代词汇论文

公诉人法庭问话中的语用策略研究--以法制节目《庭审现场》为例

Acknowledgements第4-5页
Abstract第5-6页
摘要第7-11页
Transcription Conventions第11-12页
Chapter One Introduction第12-16页
    1.1 Research Background第12-13页
    1.2 Significance of the Research第13-14页
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis第14-16页
Chapter Two Literature Review第16-25页
    2.1 Key Terms and Basic Concepts第16页
        2.1.1 Courtroom Questioning第16页
        2.1.2 Pragmatic Strategy第16页
    2.2 Theoretical Foundations第16-21页
        2.2.1 Cooperative Principle第17-18页
        2.2.2 Presupposition Theory第18-19页
        2.2.3 Speech Act Theory第19-20页
        2.2.4 Purpose-Intention Principle第20-21页
    2.3 Previous Studies Abroad and at Home第21-25页
Chapter Three Methodology第25-29页
    3.1 Research Questions第25-26页
    3.2 Materials第26页
    3.3 Data Analysis第26-28页
        3.3.1 Qualitative Analysis第26-27页
        3.3.2 Quantiative Analysis第27-28页
    3.4 Summary第28-29页
Chapter Four Results and Discussion第29-67页
    4.1 Pragmatic Strategies Used in Courtroom Questioning第29-42页
        4.1.1 Pragmatic Strategies at the Level of Discourse第29-39页
            4.1.1.1 Repetition Strategy第29-31页
            4.1.1.2 Interruption Strategy第31-32页
            4.1.1.3 Step by Step Strategy第32-34页
            4.1.1.4 Candid Strategy第34页
            4.1.1.5 Diversionary Strategy第34-37页
            4.1.1.6 Doubt Strategy第37-39页
        4.1.2 Pragmatic Strategies at the Level of Sentence第39-42页
            4.1.2.1 Vagueness Strategy第39-41页
            4.1.2.2 Presupposition Strategy第41-42页
    4.2 Realization of Pragmatic Strategies under the Guidance of Pragmatic Theories第42-57页
        4.2.1 Cooperative Principle Related Strategies第42-49页
            4.2.1.1 Violation of the Quantity Maxim-Repetition Strategy第42-44页
            4.2.1.2 Violation of the Quality Maxim-Doubt Strategy第44-46页
            4.2.1.3 Violation of the Relevance Maxim-Interruption Strategy第46-48页
            4.2.1.4 Violation of the Manner Maxim-Vagueness Strategy第48-49页
        4.2.2 Presupposition Theory Related Strategy第49-51页
        4.2.3 Speech Act Theory Related Strategies第51-55页
            4.2.3.1 Candid Strategy as Direct Speech Act第52-54页
            4.2.3.2 Diversionary Strategy as Indirect Speech Act第54-55页
        4.2.4 Purpose-Intention Principle Related Strategy第55-57页
    4.3 Comparative Analysis of Pragmatic Strategies Used with Different Objects第57-66页
        4.3.1 Differences in the Most and the Least Used Pragmatic Strategies第58-60页
        4.3.2 Differences in Pragmatic Strategies Used in between第60-66页
            4.3.2.1 Differences in Repetition Strategy第61-62页
            4.3.2.2 Differences in Interruption Strategy第62页
            4.3.2.3 Differences in Step by Step Strategy第62-63页
            4.3.2.4 Differences in Doubt Strategy第63-64页
            4.3.2.5 Differences in Vagueness Strategy第64-65页
            4.3.2.6 Differences in Presupposition Strategy第65-66页
    4.4 Summary第66-67页
Chapter Five Conclusion第67-72页
    5.1 Major Findings第67-68页
    5.2 Implications of the Study第68-69页
    5.3 Limitations of the Study第69-70页
    5.4 Suggestions for Future Research第70-72页
References第72-74页

论文共74页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:富氢培养后落叶松早期原胚发育及其mRNAs、miRNAs差异表达分析与鉴定
下一篇:马尾松针阔混交人工林种间关系和作业法研究