| Introduction | 第1-10页 |
| ChapterⅠ Translation Criteria | 第10-19页 |
| 1．1 Yan Fu's notion and his supporters and discommenders | 第10-13页 |
| 1．2 Common ground of ”equivalence” shared by Yan，Newmark and Nida | 第13-15页 |
| 1．3 Other western scholars and the concept of ”equivalence” | 第15-17页 |
| 1．4 Summary | 第17-19页 |
| ChapterⅡ Translatability vs．Untranslatability | 第19-28页 |
| 2．1 Linguistic untranslatability and cultural untranslatability | 第19-21页 |
| 2．2 Translatability as justified by six features | 第21-27页 |
| 2．3 Summary | 第27-28页 |
| ChapterⅢ Chomsky and Nida—the Theoretical Basis | 第28-36页 |
| 3．1 Chomsky and his Universal Grammar | 第28-32页 |
| 3．2 Nida's theory as grounded on transformational generative grammar | 第32-35页 |
| 3．3 Summary | 第35-36页 |
| ChapterⅣ Formal Equivalence | 第36-44页 |
| 4．1 Different typologies of ”equivalence” | 第36-37页 |
| 4．2 Misunderstanding of Nida's ”formal equivalence” | 第37-38页 |
| 4．3 True ”formal equivalence” as exemplified by Shen | 第38-42页 |
| 4．4 Summary | 第42-44页 |
| ChapterⅤ Functional Equivalence | 第44-61页 |
| 5．1 The concept of ”functional equivalence” and its significance | 第44-47页 |
| 5．2 Language functions and translation equivalence | 第47-52页 |
| 5．3 Speech act theory | 第52-54页 |
| 5．4 Partial functional equivalence and functional similarity | 第54-57页 |
| 5．5 Cultural barriers in achieving functional equivalence | 第57-59页 |
| 5．6 Summary | 第59-61页 |
| Conclusion | 第61-64页 |
| Bibliography | 第64-67页 |
