首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--语文教学论文

A Comparative Study of the Effects of Input-processing Instruction and Traditional Instruction-an Empirical Study on Chinese Middle School Students Acquisition of English Definite Article the

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS第8-9页
ABSTRACT第9-10页
摘要第11-18页
CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION第18-22页
    1.1 Orientation of the Study第18-19页
    1.2 Significance of the Study第19-21页
    1.3 Research Questions第21页
    1.4 Organization of the Dissertation第21-22页
CHAPTER Ⅱ LITERATURE REVIEW第22-40页
    2.1 Input Processing and Input Processing Instruction第22-26页
        2.1.1 Input Processing第22-23页
        2.1.2 Input Processing instruction第23-26页
    2.2 Output Hypothesis and Traditional Instruction第26-30页
        2.2.1 Swain’s Output Hypothesis第26-28页
        2.2.2 Swain’s Model of Second Language Learning Model in the Output Hypothesis第28-29页
        2.2.3 Traditional Instruction第29-30页
    2.3 Previous Researches: Processing Instruction vs. Traditional Instruction第30-36页
        2.3.1 Comparative Researches on PI and TI第31-35页
        2.3.2 Limitations of previous researches第35-36页
    2.4 Target Grammar Feature: the English Article System第36-40页
        2.4.1 Importance of the English Article System第36-37页
        2.4.2 Reasons for the Difficulty of English Article System第37-39页
        2.4.3 Previous Studies on the English Article System第39-40页
CHAPTER Ⅲ RESEARCH DESIGN第40-50页
    3.1 Subjects第40-41页
    3.2 The Rules of the English Definite Article in This Study第41-43页
    3.3 Treatments第43-46页
        3.3.1 Traditional Instruction Treatment第44页
        3.3.2 Input Processing Instruction Treatment第44-46页
        3.3.3 The Control Group第46页
    3.4 Procedures第46-50页
        3.4.1 Pilot Test第46-47页
        3.4.2 Pretest第47-48页
        3.4.3 Immediate Test第48页
        3.4.4 Delayed Test第48-50页
Chapter Ⅳ RESULTS第50-69页
    4.1 Results of Multiple-choice Questions and True-false Items第50-55页
        4.1.1 Results of Multiple-choice Questions第50-53页
        4.1.2 Results of True-false Items第53-55页
    4.2 Results of Gap-filling Items and Sentence Making Items第55-61页
        4.2.1 Results of Gap-filling Items第55-58页
        4.2.2 Results of Sentence Making Items第58-61页
    4.3 Results of the Time Effect第61-69页
        4.3.1 Time Effects of Input-processing Instruction第61-64页
        4.3.2 Time Effects of Traditional Instruction第64-69页
Chapter Ⅴ DISCUSSION第69-76页
    5.1 Major findings第69-71页
    5.2 Discussion on the Effects of Input-processing Instruction第71-72页
    5.3 Discussion on the Effects of Traditional Instruction第72-74页
    5.4 Summary第74-76页
Chapter Ⅵ CONCLUSION第76-81页
    6.1 Summary of the Present Study第76-77页
    6.2 Pedagogical Implications第77-78页
    6.3 Limitations of the Present Study第78-79页
    6.4 Suggestions for Further Researches第79-81页
REFERENCES第81-86页
Appendix 1: Pilot test第86-87页
Appendix 2: Pretest第87-89页
Appendix 3: Immediate test第89-91页
Appendix 4: Delay test第91-92页

论文共92页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:An Empirical Study of the Influence of Different Glosses on L2Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition Through Reading
下一篇:A Functionalist Approach to Translators Subjectivity in the C-E Translation of the Government Work Report(2012-2013)