首页--语言、文字论文--汉语论文--语义、词汇、词义(训诂学)论文--现代词汇论文

被告法庭辩论词中模糊限制语的语用功能研究

Abstract第5-6页
摘要第7-11页
Chapter 1 Introduction第11-17页
    1.1 Background of the research第11-13页
    1.2 Significance of the research第13-14页
    1.3 Objectives and innovations of the research第14-15页
    1.4 Data collection and analysis第15-16页
    1.5 Organization of the research第16-17页
Chapter 2 Literature Review第17-27页
    2.1 A review of hedges第17-24页
        2.1.1 Hedges from the perspective of logical-semantics第17-19页
        2.1.2 Hedges from the perspective of pragmatics第19-21页
        2.1.3 Hedges from the perspective of sociolinguistics第21-22页
        2.1.4 Hedges from the other perspectives第22-24页
    2.2 A review of hedges in court arguments第24-27页
        2.2.1 Foreign studies of hedges in court arguments第24-25页
        2.2.2 Domestic studies of hedges in court arguments第25-27页
Chapter 3 Classifications and Features of Hedges in Defendants’ Court Arguments第27-44页
    3.1 Classifications of hedges in defendants’ court arguments第27-39页
        3.1.1 Approximators第34-37页
        3.1.2 Shields第37-39页
    3.2 Features of hedges in defendants’ court arguments第39-42页
        3.2.1 Accuracy and decency in meaning expression第40-41页
        3.2.2 Euphemism and relaxation in tone expression第41-42页
    3.3 Summary第42-44页
Chapter 4 Self-protective Function of Hedges in Defendants’ Court Arguments第44-66页
    4.1 Improving the utterance meaning from degree to achieve self-protection第45-53页
        4.1.1 Reducing the ambiguity to make meaning exact第45-48页
        4.1.2 Offering premises to make meaning accurate第48-50页
        4.1.3 Denying the speaker’s implication to make meaning clear第50-53页
    4.2 Limiting the utterance meaning from scope to achieve self-protection第53-60页
        4.2.1 Using approximate numbers to make meaning authentic第53-55页
        4.2.2 Restricting the topics to make meaning decent第55-58页
        4.2.3 Blurring the precise words to make meaning appropriate第58-60页
    4.3 Obscuring the utterance meaning from time to achieve self-protection第60-64页
        4.3.1 Emphasizing the action’s frequency to make meaning truthful第60-62页
        4.3.2 Summarizing the action’s frequency to make meaning credible第62-64页
    4.4 Summary第64-66页
Chapter 5 Polite Function of Hedges in Defendants’ Court Arguments第66-82页
    5.1 Expressing the defendants’ opinions directly to show politeness第67-74页
        5.1.1 Using the subjective expressions with first-person to make tone relaxing第67-69页
        5.1.2 Using modal verbs to make tone gentle第69-72页
        5.1.3 Using conditional sentences to make tone euphemistic第72-74页
    5.2 Indicating the defendants’ views indirectly to show politeness第74-81页
        5.2.1 Stating objective facts to make tone implicit第75-77页
        5.2.2 Quoting relevant legal documents to make tone mild第77-80页
        5.2.3 Using indirect refusing words to make tone placid第80-81页
    5.3 Summary第81-82页
Chapter 6 Conclusion第82-86页
    6.1 Major findings of the research第82-84页
    6.2 Implications of the research第84-85页
    6.3 Limitations of the research第85-86页
Bibliography第86-92页
Appendix第92-93页
攻读硕士学位期间主要科研成果第93-94页
Acknowledgements第94页

论文共94页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:Z公司海外电力建设项目采购流程的优化
下一篇:内蒙古乌力吉地区金及铜多金属矿床成矿地质条件及找矿方向