| ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH | 第4-5页 |
| ABSTRACT IN CHINESE | 第6-7页 |
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | 第7-15页 |
| CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION | 第15-21页 |
| 1.1 Definition of Authorial Representation | 第15-17页 |
| 1.1.1 Authorial representation vs. authorial reference | 第15页 |
| 1.1.2 Authorial representation vs. authorial roles | 第15-16页 |
| 1.1.3 Authorial representation in this thesis | 第16-17页 |
| 1.2 Significance of the Study | 第17-18页 |
| 1.3 Research Questions | 第18页 |
| 1.4 Organization of the Thesis | 第18-21页 |
| CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW | 第21-33页 |
| 2.1 Introduction | 第21页 |
| 2.2 Studies on Authorial Representation | 第21-28页 |
| 2.2.1 Studies from the perspective of metadiscourse | 第21-23页 |
| 2.2.2 Studies from the perspective of genre | 第23-25页 |
| 2.2.3 Studies from the perspective of cross-language | 第25-26页 |
| 2.2.4 Studies from the perspective of cross-disciplines | 第26-28页 |
| 2.3 Studies on Research Article | 第28-31页 |
| 2.3.1 Studies from the perspective of structure | 第28-29页 |
| 2.3.2 Studies from the perspective of lexicogrammar | 第29-31页 |
| 2.4 Characteristics and Limitations of the Previous Researches | 第31-32页 |
| 2.5 Summary | 第32-33页 |
| CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY AND DATA COLLECTION | 第33-39页 |
| 3.1 Introduction | 第33页 |
| 3.2 Data Collection | 第33-34页 |
| 3.3 Research Procedure | 第34-38页 |
| 3.3.1 Sample study | 第34-35页 |
| 3.3.2 Data tag | 第35-36页 |
| 3.3.4 Data interpretation | 第36-38页 |
| 3.4 Summary | 第38-39页 |
| CHAPTER FOUR CLASSIFICATIONS OF AUTHORIAL REPRESENTATION AND AUTHORIAL ROLES | 第39-49页 |
| 4.1 Introduction | 第39页 |
| 4.2 Classification of Authorial Representation | 第39-40页 |
| 4.3 Authorial Roles | 第40-48页 |
| 4.3.1 As writer | 第41-42页 |
| 4.3.2 As researcher | 第42-44页 |
| 4.3.3 As arguer | 第44-45页 |
| 4.3.4 As evaluator | 第45-46页 |
| 4.3.5 As promoter | 第46-48页 |
| 4.4 Summary | 第48-49页 |
| CHAPTER FIVE A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AUTHORIAL REPRESENTATION IN FOUR DISCIPLINES | 第49-73页 |
| 5.1 Introduction | 第49页 |
| 5.2 Distribution and Frequency of Explicit and Implicit Authorial Representation in RAs in Four Disciplines | 第49-56页 |
| 5.2.1 Explicit authorial representation in RAs in four disciplines | 第50-52页 |
| 5.2.2 The distribution and frequency of“we”in RAs in four disciplines | 第52-54页 |
| 5.2.3 Implicit authorial representation in RAs in four disciplines | 第54-56页 |
| 5.3 The Distribution and Frequency of Authorial Roles in English RAs in Four Disciplines | 第56-65页 |
| 5.3.1 As researcher in four disciplines | 第58-63页 |
| 5.3.1.1 The distribution of as explicit researcher and as implicitresearcher | 第58-59页 |
| 5.3.1.2 Verbal forms collocated with authorial role as explicit andimplicit researcher in four disciplines | 第59-63页 |
| 5.3.2 As arguer in four disciplines | 第63-64页 |
| 5.3.3 As writer, evaluator and promoter in four disciplines | 第64-65页 |
| 5.4 Similarities and Differences in the Adoption of Authorial Representation in Four Disciplines | 第65-67页 |
| 5.4.1 Similarities | 第65-66页 |
| 5.4.2 Differences | 第66-67页 |
| 5.5 Discussion | 第67-70页 |
| 5.6 Summary | 第70-73页 |
| CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION | 第73-78页 |
| 6.1 Introduction | 第73页 |
| 6.2 Major Findings | 第73-75页 |
| 6.3 Significance of This Study | 第75页 |
| 6.4 Limitation of the Study and Expectation for Further Research | 第75-78页 |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | 第78-82页 |
| APPENDIX Ⅰ THE SOURCE OF DATA | 第82-91页 |
| APPENDIX Ⅱ DATA TAG SAMPLES | 第91-92页 |
| 攻读学位期间取得的研究成果 | 第92-93页 |
| 个人简况及联系方式 | 第93-96页 |
