| Acknowledgements (in Chinese) | 第4-5页 |
| Acknowledgements (in English) | 第5-6页 |
| Abstract (in Chinese) | 第6-7页 |
| Abstract (in English) | 第7页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第10-16页 |
| 1.1 Research background | 第10-14页 |
| 1.1.1 The Gadfly | 第11-13页 |
| 1.1.2 The Chinese translations of The Gadfly | 第13-14页 |
| 1.2 Research significance | 第14-15页 |
| 1.3 Structure of the present thesis | 第15-16页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第16-21页 |
| 2.1 Previous studies on the Chinese translations of The Gadfly based on literarytheories | 第16-18页 |
| 2.2 Previous studies on the translations of The Gadfly based on translation theries | 第18-19页 |
| 2.2.1 The Gadfly’s translation studies based on the theory of “ManipulationSchool” | 第18-19页 |
| 2.2.2 The Gadfly’s translation studies based other theories | 第19页 |
| 2.3 Limitations of the previous studies | 第19-21页 |
| Chapter Three Theoretical Framework: Rewriting Theory | 第21-28页 |
| 3.1 The evolution of Rewriting Theory | 第21-24页 |
| 3.2 The key concepts of Rewriting Theory | 第24-26页 |
| 3.2.1 Ideology | 第24-25页 |
| 3.2.2 Patronage | 第25页 |
| 3.2.3 Poetics | 第25-26页 |
| 3.3 The significance of Rewriting Theory | 第26-27页 |
| 3.4 Relevance of Rewriting Theory to the present study | 第27-28页 |
| Chapter Four Comparative Analysis of the Two Translations of The GadflyBased on Rewriting Theory | 第28-61页 |
| 4.1 Comparative analysis of the two translations at the ideological level | 第28-41页 |
| 4.1.1 Why is The Gadfly: the selection of the original text | 第28-32页 |
| 4.1.2 The understanding of the theme | 第32-39页 |
| 4.1.3 The transmission of the cultural elements | 第39-41页 |
| 4.2 Comparative analysis of the two translations at the patronage level | 第41-44页 |
| 4.2.1 The patronage in China in the 1950s | 第42-43页 |
| 4.2.2 The patronage in contemporary China | 第43-44页 |
| 4.3 Comparative analysis of the two translations at the poetic level | 第44-59页 |
| 4.3.1 The divergence on language of the two translations | 第45-49页 |
| 4.3.2 The divergence on rhetoric of the two translations | 第49-51页 |
| 4.3.3 The aesthetic orientation of the two translations | 第51-59页 |
| 4.4 Summary | 第59-61页 |
| Chapter Five Conclusion | 第61-63页 |
| 5.1 Major findings | 第61-62页 |
| 5.2 Limitations and suggestions | 第62-63页 |
| Appendix | 第63-69页 |
| References | 第69-73页 |
