| 摘要 | 第9-11页 |
| Abstract | 第11-12页 |
| 1. Introduction | 第13-27页 |
| 1.1 Background of Study | 第18-22页 |
| 1.2 Methodology | 第22页 |
| 1.3 Objectives and Significances of Study | 第22-23页 |
| 1.4 The Framework of the Thesis | 第23-25页 |
| 1.5 The Innovation Points of This Thesis | 第25-27页 |
| 2. Literature Review | 第27-35页 |
| 2.1 Researches Abroad | 第27-30页 |
| 2.2 Researches at Home | 第30-35页 |
| 3. Theoretical Basis | 第35-43页 |
| 3.1 Scope | 第35-37页 |
| 3.2 Prominence and Viewing Frame | 第37-40页 |
| 3.2.1 Profiling | 第37-39页 |
| 3.2.2 Viewing Frame | 第39-40页 |
| 3.3 Iconicity | 第40-43页 |
| 4. The Mapping Mechanism Between Aspects and Their CorrespondingBoundedness of Situations | 第43-98页 |
| 4.1 Situation Types | 第45-69页 |
| 4.1.1 Maximal Viewing Frame and Non-progressive Aspect | 第47-62页 |
| 4.1.2 Restricted Viewing Frame and Progressive Aspect | 第62-69页 |
| 4.2 The Continuum of Semantic Representation of the Situations of BoundedEvents and Unbounded Lasting States | 第69-75页 |
| 4.3 The Continuum of Semantic Representation of the Situations of UnboundedEvents and Bounded Temporary States | 第75-79页 |
| 4.4 The Continuum of Semantic Representation Between Bounded Situations andUnbounded Situations | 第79-88页 |
| 4.4.1 Accomplishments vs. Accomplishing Activities | 第79-80页 |
| 4.4.2 Bounded Activities vs. Unbounded Activities | 第80-82页 |
| 4.4.3 Achievements vs. Culminating Activities | 第82-83页 |
| 4.4.4 Acts vs. Iterative Activities | 第83-84页 |
| 4.4.5 Indefinitely Lasting states vs. Temporary States | 第84-87页 |
| 4.4.6 Habitual States vs. Temporary Habitual States | 第87-88页 |
| 4.4.7 Everlasting States | 第88页 |
| 4.5 Summary of the Motivations for the Transformation Between Bounded andUnbounded Situations | 第88-97页 |
| 4.6 Implication of the Study on Situation types for Teaching English AspectCategory | 第97-98页 |
| Conclusion | 第98-101页 |
| Bibliography | 第101-105页 |
| 攻读硕士学位期间发表的学术论文 | 第105-107页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第107页 |
