| 摘要 | 第4-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5-6页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第7-11页 |
| Abbreviations | 第11-13页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第13-17页 |
| 1.1 Rationale of the Study | 第13-15页 |
| 1.2 Objectives of the Study | 第15-16页 |
| 1.3 Layout of the Thesis | 第16-17页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第17-34页 |
| 2.1 Introduction | 第17页 |
| 2.2 Review on Word Class Studies | 第17-23页 |
| 2.2.1 The Origin of Word Classes Studies | 第17-18页 |
| 2.2.2 The Nature of Word Classes | 第18-19页 |
| 2.2.3 The Criteria of Word Classes | 第19-21页 |
| 2.2.4 Previous Studies of Word Class in Modern Chinese | 第21-23页 |
| 2.3 Review on Heterosemy Studies | 第23-26页 |
| 2.3.1 The Definition of Heterosemy | 第24-25页 |
| 2.3.2 The Studies on the Treatment of Heterosemy | 第25-26页 |
| 2.4 Review on Word Class Labeling Studies in Chinese-English Dictionaries . 14 | 第26-31页 |
| 2.4.1 The Benefits of Word Class Labeling in Chinese-English Dictionaries | 第27-28页 |
| 2.4.2 The Object of Word Class Labeling in Chinese-English Dictionaries | 第28-30页 |
| 2.4.3 The Principle of“Translating by POS” | 第30-31页 |
| 2.5 Previous Studies of“X然”Lexemes | 第31-33页 |
| 2.5.1 The Properties of“X然”Lexemes | 第31-32页 |
| 2.5.2 Previous Case Studies of Disyllabic“X然”lexemes | 第32-33页 |
| 2.6 Summary | 第33-34页 |
| Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation | 第34-41页 |
| 3.1 Introduction | 第34页 |
| 3.2 Theoretical Background of the Two-level Word Class Categorization Theory | 第34-38页 |
| 3.2.1 The Usage-based Theory | 第35-36页 |
| 3.2.2 The Theory of Norms and Exploitation | 第36-38页 |
| 3.3 The Main Tenets of the Two-level Word Class Categorization Theory | 第38-39页 |
| 3.4 Summary | 第39-41页 |
| Chapter Four Research Design | 第41-47页 |
| 4.1 The Selection of Dictionaries and Data Collection | 第41-42页 |
| 4.2. The Selection of Corpora and Data Processing | 第42-47页 |
| Chapter Five Results and Discussion | 第47-65页 |
| 5.1 Introduction | 第47页 |
| 5.2 The Description of Statistical Results | 第47-54页 |
| 5.3 Discussion | 第54-64页 |
| 5.3.1 Discussion based on the Word Class Labeling Results between CED3and CCD6 | 第54-56页 |
| 5.3.2 Discussion on the Word Class Labeling Results between CED3 andCorpus-based | 第56-60页 |
| 5.3.2.1 Criterion and Basis for Chinese Word Class Identification | 第56-58页 |
| 5.3.2.2 The Infeasibility of the“Principle of Parsimony” | 第58-60页 |
| 5.3.3 Discussion on the Corpus-based Case Study of Adjective- adverbialDisyllabic“X然”lexemes | 第60-64页 |
| 5.4 Summary | 第64-65页 |
| Chapter Six Conclusion | 第65-68页 |
| 6.1 Major Findings of the Study | 第65-66页 |
| 6.2 Limitations of the Study | 第66-67页 |
| 6.3 Suggestions for the Future Study | 第67-68页 |
| References | 第68-73页 |
| Appendices | 第73-89页 |
| Appendix 1 Data of Word Class Labeling of all the Disyllabic“X然”LexemesShared in CED3 and CCD6 | 第73-80页 |
| Appendix 2 Data of Disyllabic“X然”Lexemes Being Improperly Word ClassLabeled in CED3 and the Word Class Labeling Situation Based on Corpus | 第80-83页 |
| Appendix 3 Data of disyllabic“X然”lexemes Not Being Translated by POS inCED3 | 第83-87页 |
| Appendix 4 Word Class Labeling of the Symmetrical Disyllabic“X然”Lexemesin CED3 | 第87-89页 |
| Appendix 5 Disyllabic“X然”Lexemes with Confusing Word Class LabelingInformation in CED3 and the Acceptable Results Based on Corpus | 第89页 |
