| 摘要 | 第1-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5-6页 |
| 目录 | 第6-8页 |
| 1 Introduction | 第8-11页 |
| ·Research Background | 第8页 |
| ·Aim, Method and Corpus Collection | 第8-10页 |
| ·The Outline of the Study | 第10-11页 |
| 2 Literature Review | 第11-15页 |
| ·Power Study of Lawyer’s Discourse in China | 第11-12页 |
| ·Power Study of Lawyer’s Discourse abroad | 第12-14页 |
| ·Summary | 第14-15页 |
| 3 Theoretical Framework | 第15-20页 |
| ·Goal-directed Principle | 第15-17页 |
| ·The Basic Views of Power in Critical Discourse Analysis(CDA) | 第17-18页 |
| ·Analyzing Tool: goal analysis | 第18-20页 |
| 4 Goal and Power in Lawyer’s Discourse | 第20-38页 |
| ·The Main Features of Lawyer’s Discourse | 第20-22页 |
| ·Goal-directedness in Institutional Discourse | 第20页 |
| ·Professionalism in Discourse Vocabularies | 第20-21页 |
| ·Formulation in Turn-taking | 第21页 |
| ·Predictability in Content and Way of Expressing | 第21-22页 |
| ·Three Types of Goal Relationship in Lawyer’s Discourse | 第22-33页 |
| ·Identical-goal Relationship | 第23-28页 |
| ·Conflicting-goal Relationship | 第28-33页 |
| ·Neutral-goal Relationship | 第33页 |
| ·Two Types of Power in Lawyer’s Discourse | 第33-35页 |
| ·Institutional Power | 第34页 |
| ·Contextual Power | 第34-35页 |
| ·The Asymmetry of Professional Kowledge and educational background | 第34-35页 |
| ·The Asymmetry of the Discourse Resource | 第35页 |
| ·The Interrelation of Goal and Power in Lawyer’s Discourse | 第35-38页 |
| 5 Conclusions | 第38-41页 |
| ·Major findings | 第38页 |
| ·Enlightenment for judicial practice | 第38-39页 |
| ·Limitations of the study | 第39-40页 |
| ·Suggestions for further study | 第40-41页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第41-42页 |
| References | 第42-45页 |
| Appendix | 第45页 |
