| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | 第6-7页 |
| ABSTRACT | 第7-8页 |
| 摘要 | 第9-14页 |
| Chapter One INTRODUCTION | 第14-18页 |
| 1.1 Significance of the Study | 第14-15页 |
| 1.2 Purposes of the Study | 第15-16页 |
| 1.3 Organization of the Thesis | 第16-18页 |
| Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW | 第18-34页 |
| 2.1 The Definitions of Intertextuality | 第18-22页 |
| 2.1.1 The Definitions of Intertextuality in Literary Criticism | 第18-20页 |
| 2.1.2 The Definitions of Intertextuality in Discourse Analysis | 第20-22页 |
| 2.2 The Major Realizations of Intertextuality in Academic Papers | 第22-31页 |
| 2.2.1 Citations | 第22-25页 |
| 2.2.2 Reporting and Reporting Verbs | 第25-31页 |
| 2.3 Intertextuality, Stance and Voice | 第31-33页 |
| 2.4 Summary | 第33-34页 |
| Chapter Three METHODOLOGY | 第34-41页 |
| 3.1 Research Questions | 第34页 |
| 3.2 Data Collection | 第34-35页 |
| 3.3 Data Processing and Tagging | 第35-37页 |
| 3.4 Analysis Framework | 第37-41页 |
| Chapter Four RESULTS AND DISCUSSION | 第41-63页 |
| 4.1 The Examination of Inter-Coder Reliability | 第41-43页 |
| 4.2 Using Citations to Construct Differing Voices | 第43-55页 |
| 4.2.1 Similar Density of Citations in Two Corpora | 第44-46页 |
| 4.2.2 Different Preferences of Discursive Patterns in Two Corpora | 第46-48页 |
| 4.2.3 Low Incidence of Method Citations in Students’ Corpus | 第48-51页 |
| 4.2.4 Predominant Use of Signposting Function in Students’ Corpus | 第51-55页 |
| 4.3 Using Reporting Verbs to Persuade the Reader | 第55-63页 |
| 4.3.1 Reservation of Stance in the Students’ Choice of Reporting Verbs | 第56-59页 |
| 4.3.2 Misuse of Past Tense in the Students’ Expression of Stance | 第59-63页 |
| Chapter Five CONCLUSION | 第63-68页 |
| 5.1 Major Findings | 第63-65页 |
| 5.2 Implications for the Instruction of English Academic Writing | 第65-67页 |
| 5.3 Limitations of This Study and Suggestions for Future Researches | 第67-68页 |
| REFERENCES | 第68-70页 |
