ABSTRACT | 第4页 |
摘要 | 第5-8页 |
1. INTRODUCTION | 第8-11页 |
1.1 Background of the Experiment | 第8页 |
1.2 Purpose of the Experiment | 第8-9页 |
1.3 Significance of the Experiment | 第9-10页 |
1.4 Experiment Methodology | 第10-11页 |
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK | 第11-13页 |
2.1 Eysenck Personality Questionnaire | 第11-12页 |
2.2 Interpreting Performance Assessment | 第12-13页 |
3. The Experiment Approach | 第13-15页 |
3.1 Objectives | 第13页 |
3.2 Subjects | 第13页 |
3.3 Variables | 第13-14页 |
3.4 Material | 第14页 |
3.5 Procedure | 第14页 |
3.6 Data Collection | 第14-15页 |
4. RESULTS | 第15-34页 |
4.1 Identification of Subjects’ Personality Types | 第15页 |
4.2 Subjects’ Performance in CI | 第15-25页 |
4.2.1 The Measurement of Subjects’ Performance | 第19页 |
4.2.2 Descriptive Statistics of Subjects’ Interpreting Performance | 第19-21页 |
4.2.3 Descriptive Statistics of the Scores of the Participants in Each Layer of Interpretation Performance | 第21-25页 |
4.3 The Correlation Between Personality Types and Interpreting Performance | 第25-34页 |
4.3.1 The Correlation between Personality Types and Their overall scores in Interpreting Performance | 第25-27页 |
4.3.2 The Correlation between the Four Personality Types and Their Scores of Separate Layers in Interpreting Accuracy | 第27-34页 |
5. DATA ANALYSIS | 第34-36页 |
5.1 Analysis of the Correlation between Personality Types and Total Scores of Their Interpreting performance | 第34-35页 |
5.2 Analysis of the Correlation between the Scores of Participants in Each Layer of Interpretation Performance and Their Personality Types | 第35-36页 |
6. CONCLUSIONS | 第36-39页 |
6.1 Limitations | 第36-37页 |
6.2 Conclusions | 第37页 |
6.3 Implications | 第37-39页 |
6.3.1 Implications for Interpreting Teachers | 第37-38页 |
6.3.2 Implications for Interpreting Practitioners | 第38-39页 |
REFERENCES | 第39-41页 |
Appendix A EPQ 人格测试问卷 | 第41-47页 |
Appendix B Transcript of the interpreting material | 第47-48页 |