| Introduction | 第1-12页 |
| Chapter One Theoretical Foundation: Skopos Theory | 第12-22页 |
| ·Genealogy of Skopos Theory | 第13-15页 |
| ·Basic Ideas of Skopos Theory | 第15-20页 |
| ·Highlights of Skopos Theory | 第20-22页 |
| Chapter Two Purpose of the Original Text | 第22-30页 |
| ·Situation of the Original Text | 第22-23页 |
| ·Intention of Huxley | 第23-26页 |
| ·Intratextual factors of the Original Text | 第26-28页 |
| ·Purpose of the Original Text | 第28-30页 |
| Chapter Three Skopos of the Target Text | 第30-48页 |
| ·Situation of the Target Text | 第30-33页 |
| ·Addressee Analysis | 第33-38页 |
| ·Conservatives | 第34-35页 |
| ·Feudal Reformers | 第35-37页 |
| ·Progressive Intellectuals | 第37-38页 |
| ·Background Knowledge about Yan Fu | 第38-45页 |
| ·Introduction toYan Fu | 第38-41页 |
| ·Intention of Yan Fu | 第41-45页 |
| ·Skopos of the Target Text | 第45-48页 |
| ·Skopos of the Target Text as a Whole | 第45-46页 |
| ·Skopoi of Parts of the Target Text | 第46-48页 |
| Chapter Four Manipulative Influence of Skopos over Yan Fu’s “Faithfulness”in Translating Target Text | 第48-79页 |
| ·Comparison of Purpose of the Original Text and Skopos of the Target text | 第49-51页 |
| ·Agreement between Purpose of the Original Text and Skopos of the Target Text | 第49页 |
| ·Disagreement between Purpose of the Original Text and Skopos of the Target Text | 第49-51页 |
| ·Manipulative Influence of Skopos over Translating Activity in Target Text | 第51-79页 |
| ·Manipulative Influence of Skopos over Yan Fu’s “Faithfulness”in Translating Target Text as a Whole | 第51-62页 |
| ·Main Content of the Original Text | 第52-53页 |
| ·Main Content of the Target Text | 第53-62页 |
| ·Manipulative Influence of Skopoi over Yan Fu’s “Faithfulness”in Translating Parts of the Target Text | 第62-79页 |
| ·Manipulative Influence of Skopos One | 第62-71页 |
| ·Destruction of Conservative Ideologies | 第63-69页 |
| ·Warning to the Chinese and Appealing for Fundamental Changes | 第69-71页 |
| ·Manipulative Influence of Skopos Two | 第71-75页 |
| ·Popularization of Western Knowledge | 第72-74页 |
| ·Corrosion to the Opinion that There Was a Qualitative Abyss Dividing “Western Barbarians”from Chinese | 第74-75页 |
| ·Manipulative Influence of Skopos Three | 第75-79页 |
| Conclusion | 第79-81页 |
| Notes | 第81-84页 |
| Works Cited | 第84-87页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第87页 |
