中文摘要 | 第4-9页 |
ABSTRACT | 第9-14页 |
LIST OF ACRONYMS | 第18-21页 |
CHAPTER 1 Introduction | 第21-29页 |
CHAPTER 2 Theoretical framework | 第29-63页 |
2.1. The positivist theories | 第30-38页 |
2.1.1. Realism:the shortcomings of a state-centric perspective on maritime safety | 第31-34页 |
2.1.2. Liberalism:the inclusion of intergovernmental actors in the globalized era | 第34-37页 |
2.1.3. Implications | 第37-38页 |
2.2. The constructivist theories: the rise of post-positivist interpretations ofnorm entrepreneurs in world politics | 第38-43页 |
2.3. The critical social theories: challenging the mainstream perspectives on therole of non-state actors in international relations | 第43-50页 |
2.3.1. The principles of critical social theories:questioning the mainstream | 第43-46页 |
2.3.2. Hegemonism:pointing the finger at neoliberal and capitalist processes inglobal governance | 第46-48页 |
2.3.3. The theory of practice:conflict of interest and power struggle in worldpolitics | 第48-50页 |
2.4. The principles of the theory of practice | 第50-58页 |
2.4.1. Fields | 第51-52页 |
2.4.2. Habitus | 第52-54页 |
2.4.3. Capitals | 第54-56页 |
2.4.4. Strategies | 第56-58页 |
2.5. Implications | 第58-63页 |
CHAPTER 3 Methodology | 第63-81页 |
3.1. Methodology | 第63-66页 |
3.1.1. Critical methodology | 第63-65页 |
3.1.2. Historical methodology | 第65-66页 |
3.2. Four steps of social inquiry: enacting the theory of practice | 第66-73页 |
3.2.1. Accessing practice | 第68-69页 |
3.2.2. Methodologic implication of a field description | 第69-70页 |
3.2.3. Empirical approaches of habitus | 第70-71页 |
3.2.4. Investigating the strategies | 第71-73页 |
3.3. A multiple-case study design | 第73-75页 |
3.3.1. Case design | 第73-74页 |
3.3.2. Case selection | 第74-75页 |
3.4. Research methods | 第75-80页 |
3.4.1. Interviews | 第75-77页 |
3.4.2. Focus group | 第77-78页 |
3.4.3. Textual analysis | 第78-80页 |
3.5. Summary | 第80-81页 |
CHAPTER 4 Interwoven interests of actors and central position ofclassification societies | 第81-103页 |
4.1. States: the conflicting interests of developed and developing states | 第82-87页 |
4.1.1. Traditional maritime states:a struggle to maintain their dominance | 第83-84页 |
4.1.2. Developing states:open-registries as challengers to traditional maritimestates | 第84-87页 |
4.2. International Maritime Organization | 第87-90页 |
4.2.1. A forum for policy-making: global and monopolistic ambitions | 第87-89页 |
4.2.2. Specific stakes in the field of maritime safety | 第89-90页 |
4.3. Shipowners | 第90-93页 |
4.3.1. Competing responses to maritime safety regulations | 第90-92页 |
4.3.2. Power struggles with states | 第92-93页 |
4.4. Classification societies: central actors in the field | 第93-99页 |
4.4.1. Integration throughout the industrial chain | 第93-95页 |
4.4.2. Integration at the supranational level | 第95-97页 |
4.4.3. Close association with the mission of the International Maritime Organization | 第97-99页 |
4.5. Summary | 第99-103页 |
CHAPTER 5 Unequal repartition of resources among actors | 第103-139页 |
5.1. Symbolic capital | 第103-116页 |
5.1.1. States: a sovereign hub for domestic interest groups | 第103-106页 |
5.1.2. International Maritime Organization: the prestige of one's constituency | 第106-107页 |
5.1.3. Shipowners: a reputation at stake in the field | 第107-108页 |
5.1.4. Classification societies: respect and immunity | 第108-116页 |
5.2. Economic capital | 第116-126页 |
5.2.1. States: taxation versus attractiveness | 第116-117页 |
5.2.2. International Maritime Organization: conventions with international impacton industrial actors | 第117-118页 |
5.2.3. Shipowners and their capital intensive physical assets | 第118-119页 |
5.2.4. Classification societies:"no class, no cash" | 第119-126页 |
5.3. Social capital | 第126-130页 |
5.3.1. States:from the reduction of state servants to diversity in nationaldelegations | 第126-128页 |
5.3.2. International Maritime Organization: the major hub for both state and non-state actor | 第128页 |
5.3.3. Shipowners: a dependence on NGOs and national delegations | 第128-129页 |
5.3.4. Classification societies:from a global network of employees and offices to astrong presence from the shipyard to the International Maritime Organization | 第129-130页 |
5.4. Information capital | 第130-135页 |
5.4.1. States:the limited global relevance of domestic data | 第131页 |
5.4.2. International Maritime Organization: the source of official agenda and textprojects | 第131-132页 |
5.4.3. Classification Societies:an undisputed historically constituted body ofknowledge | 第132-134页 |
5.4.4. Shipowners | 第134-135页 |
5.5. Summary | 第135-139页 |
CHAPTER 6 The rise of non-state actors sustained by the habits of theactors | 第139-159页 |
6.1. States:delegation and (limited) control | 第139-141页 |
6.1.1. Delegation of public obligation to the private sector | 第139-140页 |
6.1.2. A limited public control on classification societies | 第140-141页 |
6.2. International Maritime Organization | 第141-144页 |
6.2.1. Source of conventions | 第141-142页 |
6.2.2. Generation of public services (and delegation to the private sector) | 第142-144页 |
6.3. Shipowners | 第144-147页 |
6.3.1. Integration of classification certificates into business processes | 第144-145页 |
6.3.2. Additional parallel relations with classification societies as gate keepers | 第145-147页 |
6.4. Classification societies | 第147-155页 |
6.4.1. Valorization of information | 第147-149页 |
6.4.2. Institutionalization of the association with the International MaritimeOrganization | 第149-150页 |
6.4.3. Mechanism designed to safeguard its capitals and reputation for quality | 第150-152页 |
6.4.4. Multiplicity of lobbying options | 第152-153页 |
6.4.5. Professional provider of institutional services | 第153-154页 |
6.4.6. Close collaboration with national administration and with actors throughoutthe industrial shipping chain | 第154-155页 |
6.5. Summary | 第155-159页 |
CHAPTER 7 Conclusion | 第159-175页 |
7.1. Review | 第159-164页 |
7.2. Findings of the empirical study | 第164-166页 |
7.3. Limitations | 第166-167页 |
7.4. Contribution and future research | 第167-175页 |
LIST OF INTERVIEWEES | 第175-179页 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY | 第179-194页 |