| Acknowledgements | 第1-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5-7页 |
| 摘要 | 第7-12页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第12-16页 |
| ·Brief Introduction to the Dating Program in China | 第12页 |
| ·Necessity of the Study | 第12-13页 |
| ·Research Question | 第13页 |
| ·Data Collection and Research Methodology of the Thesis | 第13-14页 |
| ·The Structure of the Thesis | 第14-16页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第16-36页 |
| ·Grice’s Conversational Implicature | 第16-22页 |
| ·Cooperative Principle | 第17-19页 |
| ·Violation of Cooperative Principle | 第19-21页 |
| ·Conversational Implicature | 第21-22页 |
| ·Leech’s Politeness Principle | 第22-24页 |
| ·Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Theory | 第24-27页 |
| ·Concept of Face | 第24-25页 |
| ·Face-threatening Act Theory | 第25-26页 |
| ·Four Kinds of Politeness Strategies | 第26-27页 |
| ·Studies on You Are the One from Linguistic Point of View | 第27-29页 |
| ·Studies on You Are the One from Speech Act Theory | 第27-28页 |
| ·Studies on You Are the One from Discourse Construction | 第28-29页 |
| ·Studies on You Are the One from Other Aspects | 第29-34页 |
| ·Studies on You Are the One from Broadcasting Point of View | 第29-32页 |
| ·Studies on You Are the One from the Audiences Point of View | 第32-34页 |
| ·Summary | 第34-36页 |
| ·Evaluation of the Three Theories | 第34-35页 |
| ·Deficiencies in Previous Studies | 第35-36页 |
| Chapter Three Theoretical Framework | 第36-44页 |
| ·Off-record Strategy | 第36-42页 |
| 1 Giving Hints | 第36页 |
| 2 Giving Association Clues | 第36-37页 |
| 3 Understatement | 第37页 |
| 4 Overstatement | 第37页 |
| 5 Using Tautology | 第37-38页 |
| 6 Using Contradictions | 第38页 |
| 7 Using Irony | 第38-39页 |
| 8 Using Metaphors | 第39-40页 |
| 9 Using Rhetorical Questions | 第40页 |
| 10 Being Ambiguous | 第40-41页 |
| 11 Being Vague | 第41页 |
| 12 Over-Generalization | 第41页 |
| 13 Displacing Hearer | 第41页 |
| 14 Being Incomplete and Using Ellipsis | 第41-42页 |
| 15 Presupposing | 第42页 |
| ·Summary | 第42-44页 |
| Chapter Four Case Analysis: Conversational Implicature in You Are the One | 第44-66页 |
| ·Generating Conversational Implicature by Violation of the Maxim of Quality | 第44-51页 |
| ·Using Ironic Expressions | 第44-46页 |
| ·Using Metaphors | 第46-49页 |
| ·Using Rhetorical Questions | 第49-51页 |
| ·Generating Conversational Implicature by Violation of the Maxim of Quantity | 第51-56页 |
| ·Using Understatement | 第51-54页 |
| ·Using Overstatement | 第54-56页 |
| ·Generating Conversational Implicature by Violation of the Maxim of Relation | 第56-59页 |
| ·Generating Conversational Implicature by Violation of the Maxim of Manner | 第59-63页 |
| ·Displacing Hearer | 第59-62页 |
| ·Being Ambiguous | 第62-63页 |
| ·Summary | 第63-66页 |
| Chapter Five Conclusion | 第66-70页 |
| ·Major Findings of the Study | 第66-67页 |
| ·Implications of the Study | 第67页 |
| ·Limitations of the Study | 第67-68页 |
| ·Recommendations for Further Researches | 第68-70页 |
| Bibliography | 第70-74页 |
