| ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | 第1-7页 |
| 中文摘要 | 第7-8页 |
| ABSTRACT | 第8-10页 |
| 前言 | 第10-12页 |
| LIST OF TABLES | 第12-13页 |
| CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION | 第13-19页 |
| ·NEED FOR THE STUDY | 第13-17页 |
| ·Current Situation of Non-English Majors' Writing Performance | 第13-16页 |
| ·Solutions to the Problems | 第16-17页 |
| ·A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY | 第17-18页 |
| ·AN OVERALL STRUCTURE OF THIS THESIS | 第18-19页 |
| CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK | 第19-43页 |
| ·THEORIES RELATED TO THE STUDY | 第19-28页 |
| ·Current Approaches to ESL/EFL Writing Instruction | 第19-28页 |
| ·DISCUSSION OF SOME BASIC CONCEPTS | 第28-34页 |
| ·Output Hypothesis | 第28-29页 |
| ·SBI and the Role of Teacher in SBI | 第29-34页 |
| ·A DESCRIPTION OF RELATED EMPIRICAL STUDIES | 第34-37页 |
| ·ADAPTATIONS OF LENGTH APPROACH | 第37-43页 |
| ·An Adaptation of Task Design | 第38-39页 |
| ·An Adaptation of the Way of Giving Feedback | 第39-42页 |
| ·SBI Used as an Auxiliary Part of the Length Approach | 第42-43页 |
| CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY | 第43-55页 |
| ·RESEARCH QUESTIONS | 第43页 |
| ·What are the effects of the Length Approach on students' English learning? | 第43页 |
| ·What are the students' attitudes toward the Length Approach and the SBI? | 第43页 |
| ·Are there some correlations between SBI & LA, SBI & Writing Ability, SBI & Holistic English Proficiency, LA & Writing Ability, LA & Holistic English Proficiency? | 第43页 |
| ·TRAINING DESIGN | 第43-47页 |
| ·Experimental Procedures | 第43-44页 |
| ·Participants | 第44-45页 |
| ·Training Materials | 第45-46页 |
| ·Writing Test | 第46页 |
| ·English Proficiency Test | 第46页 |
| ·Interviews | 第46-47页 |
| ·INSTRUMENTS | 第47-49页 |
| ·Questionnaire Survey | 第47页 |
| ·Writing Test | 第47-48页 |
| ·Language Proficiency Test | 第48页 |
| ·Interviews | 第48-49页 |
| ·DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS | 第49-55页 |
| ·Answers to Questionnaire One | 第49-54页 |
| ·The Pre-test of English Proficiency | 第54页 |
| ·The Pre-writing Test | 第54页 |
| ·The Rating of the Composition | 第54-55页 |
| CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION | 第55-70页 |
| ·RESULTS OF QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION | 第55-63页 |
| ·Results on Their Writing ability and English Proficiency | 第55-58页 |
| ·Results on This Writing Training and Length Approach | 第58-60页 |
| ·Results on SBI | 第60-62页 |
| ·Correlations Between SBI & Length Approach, SBI & Writing Ability, SBI & Holistic English Proficiency, Length Approach & Writing Ability | 第62-63页 |
| ·RESULTS OF QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION | 第63-70页 |
| ·Results on Their Writing Competence and English Proficiency | 第63-67页 |
| ·Results on the Length Approach | 第67-69页 |
| ·Results on SBI | 第69-70页 |
| CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION | 第70-73页 |
| ·MAJOR FINDINGS | 第70-71页 |
| ·IMPLICATIONS | 第71-72页 |
| ·Theoretical Implications | 第71页 |
| ·Practical Implications | 第71-72页 |
| ·LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH | 第72-73页 |
| REFERENCE | 第73-77页 |
| APPENDIX 1 | 第77-79页 |
| APPENDIX 2 | 第79-81页 |
| APPENDIX 3 | 第81-84页 |
| APPENDIX 4 | 第84-85页 |
| APPENDIX 5 | 第85-89页 |
| APPENDIX 6 | 第89-91页 |
| APPendix7 | 第91-94页 |
