| Abstract | 第3页 |
| 摘要 | 第4-7页 |
| 1 Introduction | 第7-11页 |
| 1.1 Research background | 第7-8页 |
| 1.2 Significance of the study | 第8-9页 |
| 1.3 Research methodology | 第9-10页 |
| 1.4 Organization of the study | 第10-11页 |
| 2 Literature Review | 第11-19页 |
| 2.1 Relevant concepts and definitions of conflict talk | 第11-13页 |
| 2.1.1 Relevant concepts of conflict talk | 第11-12页 |
| 2.1.2 Definition of conflict talk | 第12-13页 |
| 2.2 Classification of conflict talk | 第13-14页 |
| 2.3 Previous studies on conflict talk | 第14-19页 |
| 2.3.1 Previous study of conflict talk abroad | 第14-16页 |
| 2.3.2 Previous study of conflict talk at home | 第16-18页 |
| 2.3.3 Previous study of conflict talk based on relevance theory | 第18-19页 |
| 3 Theoretical Framework of the Study | 第19-27页 |
| 3.1 The relevance theory | 第19-25页 |
| 3.1.1 Ostensive-inferential communication | 第20-22页 |
| 3.1.2 Cognitive environments and mutual manifestness | 第22-24页 |
| 3.1.3 The principle of relevance | 第24-25页 |
| 3.2 The conversation analysis theory | 第25-27页 |
| 3.2.1 Turn-taking | 第25-26页 |
| 3.2.2 Adjacency pairs | 第26页 |
| 3.2.3 Preference organization | 第26-27页 |
| 4 The Stages of Conflict Talks in Mom between Mom and Daughter | 第27-41页 |
| 4.1 The initiation stage | 第27-31页 |
| 4.1.1 Statement vs. negation | 第28-30页 |
| 4.1.2 Directive vs. refusal | 第30页 |
| 4.1.3 Question vs. opposition | 第30-31页 |
| 4.2 The escalation stage | 第31-36页 |
| 4.2.1 Argument | 第32-33页 |
| 4.2.2 Rhetorical question | 第33-34页 |
| 4.2.3 Non-obedience | 第34页 |
| 4.2.4 Interruption | 第34-35页 |
| 4.2.5 Repetition | 第35-36页 |
| 4.3 The termination stage | 第36-41页 |
| 4.3.1 Submission | 第37页 |
| 4.3.2 Compromise | 第37-38页 |
| 4.3.3 Stand-off | 第38-39页 |
| 4.3.4 Third-party intervention | 第39-41页 |
| 5 Analysis of the Reasons of Conflict Talks between Mom and Daughter Basedon Relevance Theory | 第41-67页 |
| 5.1 Ostensive-inferential communication | 第41-53页 |
| 5.1.1 Informative intention and conflict talk | 第42-47页 |
| 5.1.2 Communicative intention and conflict talk | 第47-53页 |
| 5.2 Mutual manifestness of cognitive environment | 第53-58页 |
| 5.2.1 Failure in overlapping cognitive environment | 第53-56页 |
| 5.2.2 Pretending to be irrelevant in cognitive environment | 第56-58页 |
| 5.3 Pragmatic relevance and conflict talk | 第58-67页 |
| 5.3.1 Lack of speech act relevance | 第59-62页 |
| 5.3.2 Lack of conversational demand relevance | 第62-63页 |
| 5.3.3 Lack of conversational topical relevance | 第63-67页 |
| 6 Conclusion | 第67-71页 |
| 6.1 Major findings | 第67-69页 |
| 6.2 Limitations of the present study | 第69-70页 |
| 6.3 Suggestions for further research | 第70-71页 |
| Bibliography | 第71-75页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第75-76页 |
| 攻读硕士学位期间发表的论文 | 第76-78页 |
