| 摘要 | 第1-6页 |
| Abstract | 第6-9页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第9-10页 |
| Abbreviations | 第10-11页 |
| List of Figures | 第11-12页 |
| List of Tables | 第12-13页 |
| Table of Contents | 第13-16页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第16-21页 |
| ·Research Background | 第16-17页 |
| ·Research Objectives | 第17-18页 |
| ·Methodology | 第18页 |
| ·Significance of the Present Study | 第18-19页 |
| ·Layout of the Thesis | 第19-21页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第21-34页 |
| ·Key Concepts | 第21-27页 |
| ·Language Transfer | 第21页 |
| ·Semantic Transfer | 第21-22页 |
| ·Conceptual Transfer | 第22-25页 |
| ·Conceptual Competence | 第25-27页 |
| ·Previous Studies on Semantic Transfer | 第27页 |
| ·Previous Studies on Conceptual Transfer | 第27-32页 |
| ·Summary | 第32-34页 |
| Chapter Three Theoretical Framework | 第34-52页 |
| ·Current Conception of Conceptual Competence | 第34-37页 |
| ·The Psycholinguistic View on Conceptual Competence | 第34-36页 |
| ·The Cognitive Linguistic View on Conceptual Competence | 第36-37页 |
| ·Jiang Meng’s Criticisms of Previous Views on Conceptual Competence | 第37页 |
| ·Theoretical Model of Conceptual Competence | 第37-47页 |
| ·Sub-Abilities of Conceptual Competence | 第39-43页 |
| ·Language-Specificity of Conceptual Competence | 第43-46页 |
| ·Conceptual Structure of FL Conceptual Competence | 第46-47页 |
| ·Model of the Process of NLMC Transfer in FL Comprehension | 第47-49页 |
| ·Summary | 第49-52页 |
| Chapter Four Methodology | 第52-61页 |
| ·Research Questions | 第52页 |
| ·Research Design | 第52-54页 |
| ·Method | 第54-60页 |
| ·Subjects | 第54-55页 |
| ·Apparatus | 第55页 |
| ·Materials | 第55-58页 |
| ·Procedures | 第58-60页 |
| ·Data Collection | 第60-61页 |
| Chapter Five Results and Discussion | 第61-69页 |
| ·Comparisons of SMC Sentence Comprehension with EMC Sentence Comprehension | 第61-63页 |
| ·A Comparison of the RT and AR in Comprehending SMC Sentence with EMC Sentence in Task One | 第62-63页 |
| ·A Comparison of the RT and AR in Comprehending SMC Sentence with EMC Sentence in Task Two | 第63页 |
| ·Comparisons of Sentence Comprehension Between Task One and Task Two | 第63-65页 |
| ·A Comparison of the RT and AR in SMC Sentence Comprehension Between Task One and Task Two | 第64页 |
| ·A Comparison of the RT and AR in EMC Sentence Comprehension Between Task One and Task Two | 第64-65页 |
| ·General Discussion | 第65-67页 |
| ·Summary | 第67-69页 |
| Chapter Six Conclusions | 第69-72页 |
| ·Major Findings | 第69-70页 |
| ·Pedagogical Implications | 第70页 |
| ·Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study | 第70-72页 |
| References | 第72-79页 |
| Appendix One: The Profile of Subjects | 第79-80页 |
| Appendix Two: Lickert Scale of Familiarity Judgment | 第80-87页 |
| Appendix Three: Stimuli | 第87-115页 |
| Appendix Four: Classification of Experimental Material | 第115页 |
