| 摘要 | 第4-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5-6页 |
| 1 Introduction | 第11-21页 |
| 1.1 Research background | 第12-14页 |
| 1.1.1 Objectives | 第12-13页 |
| 1.1.2 Research Questions | 第13页 |
| 1.1.3 Significance of Study | 第13-14页 |
| 1.1.4 Limitations | 第14页 |
| 1.2 Definition of terms | 第14-21页 |
| 1.2.1 Need, stimulus and motive | 第15-17页 |
| 1.2.2 Stimulation and motivation | 第17-18页 |
| 1.2.3 Motivation and corporate culture | 第18-21页 |
| 2 Theoretical overview | 第21-40页 |
| 2.1 Traditional theories | 第22-23页 |
| 2.2 Substantial motivation theories | 第23-28页 |
| 2.2.1 Maslow's motivation theory | 第24-25页 |
| 2.2.2 Herzberg's two-factor theory | 第25-27页 |
| 2.2.3 McClelland's three-factor theory | 第27-28页 |
| 2.2.4 McGregor's X and Y theories | 第28页 |
| 2.3 Procedural motivation theories | 第28-36页 |
| 2.3.1 Vroom's expectancy theory | 第29页 |
| 2.3.2 Stacey Adams's justice theory | 第29-30页 |
| 2.3.3 Porter-Lawler's theory | 第30-31页 |
| 2.3.4 Gerchikov's motivational typology | 第31-36页 |
| 2.4 Hofstede cultural diversity theory | 第36-40页 |
| 3 Practical part of the research | 第40-76页 |
| 3.1 Methodology | 第40-42页 |
| 3.2 Choice of companies for analysis | 第42-43页 |
| 3.3 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese cultures on the basis of Hofstede culturaldiversity typology | 第43-49页 |
| 3.3.1 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese cultures on the basis of Hofstede cultural diversity typology:power distance | 第44页 |
| 3.3.2 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese cultures on the basis of Hofstede cultural diversity typology:individualism | 第44-45页 |
| 3.3.3 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese cultures on the basis of Hofstede cultural diversity typology:masculinity | 第45-46页 |
| 3.3.4 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese cultures on the basis of Hofstede cultural diversity typology:uncertainty avoidance | 第46-47页 |
| 3.3.5 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese cultures on the basis of Hofstede cultural diversity typology:context | 第47-49页 |
| 3.4 Analysis of Belarusian and Chinese corporate culture in respect to motivationwith the help of Gerchikov's motivation typology | 第49-54页 |
| 3.4.1 Analysis of Belarusian corporate culture in respect to motivation with the help of Gerchikov's motivation typology | 第50-51页 |
| 3.4.2 Analysis of Chinese corporate culture in respect to motivation with the help of Gerchikov's motivation typology | 第51-52页 |
| 3.4.3 Comparison of Belarusian and Chinese corporate culture in respect to motivation on the basis of Gerchikov's motivation typology | 第52-54页 |
| 3.5 Comparison of Belarusian and Chinese motivation systems on the basis ofHerzberg's two-factor theory | 第54-65页 |
| 3.5.1 Analysis of the results gathered by Herzberg's test | 第57-63页 |
| 3.5.2 Analysis of the hygiene and motivational factors' level in the companies of Belarus and China | 第63-65页 |
| 3.6 Suggestions for improvement of personnel motivation of Chinese andBelarusian organizations' interaction | 第65-76页 |
| 3.6.1 Corporate culture | 第66-67页 |
| 3.6.2 Delegation | 第67-68页 |
| 3.6.3 Improvement of feedback and communication channels | 第68-70页 |
| 3.6.4 Public recognition and career growth | 第70-72页 |
| 3.6.5 Monetary motivation | 第72-73页 |
| 3.6.6 Conflict management | 第73-76页 |
| Conclusions | 第76-79页 |
| References | 第79-82页 |
| Appendix A Herchikov's Motype test | 第82-86页 |
| Appendix B Table for the analysis of the Motype test | 第86-87页 |
| Appendix C Herzberg's test | 第87-91页 |
| Research Projects and Publications during Master Study Period | 第91-92页 |
| Acknowledgement | 第92-93页 |
