首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--语法论文

英语可数名词与不可数名词互转的认知解读

摘要第5-6页
Abstract第6页
Contents第7-9页
Figure第9-10页
Chapter 1 Introduction第10-14页
    1.1 Motivation of the Study第10-11页
    1.2 Objectives of the Study第11页
    1.3 Significance of the Study第11-12页
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis第12-14页
Chapter 2 Literature Review第14-24页
    2.1 Definitions of Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第14-15页
    2.2 Previous Studies on English Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第15-19页
    2.3 Previous Studies on Interconversion of English Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第19-22页
    2.4 A Brief Summary第22-24页
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework第24-37页
    3.1 Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics第24-25页
    3.2 Theory of Boundedness and Unboundedness第25-30页
        3.2.1 A Preliminary about Theory of Boundedness and Unboundedness第25页
        3.2.2 Boundedness and Unboundedness Theory第25-29页
        3.2.3 Mechanism for Boundedness and Unboundedness Theory第29-30页
    3.3 Conceptual Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics第30-36页
        3.3.1 Traditional Study of Metonymy第30-31页
        3.3.2 Conceptual Metonymy Theory within Cognitive Linguistics第31-36页
    3.4 A Brief Summary第36-37页
Chapter 4 Cognitive Analysis for Interconversion of Count Noun and Mass Noun第37-58页
    4.1 Boundedness and Unboundedness Theory and Interconversion of Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第37-49页
        4.1.1 Conversion of Count Nouns to Mass Nouns第38-44页
        4.1.2 Conversion of Mass Nouns to Count Nouns第44-49页
        4.1.3 A Brief Summary第49页
    4.2 Conceptual Metonymy Theory and Interconversion of Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第49-55页
        4.2.1 Metonymic Mechanism for Interconversion of Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第49-51页
        4.2.2 Specific Analysis of Conceptual Metonymy in Interconversion of Count Nouns and Mass Nouns第51-55页
    4.3 Insights on Pedagogical Applications第55-56页
    4.4 A Brief Summary第56-58页
Conclusion第58-60页
References第60-63页
Appendix A 攻读学位期间所发表的学术论文第63-64页
Appendix B 详细中文摘要第64-67页
Acknowledgements第67页

论文共67页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:教师修正性反馈对高职理科学生写作中冠词使用的影响
下一篇:基于图式理论的大学英语教材阅读部分的比较评估