首页--语言、文字论文--汉语论文--语义、词汇、词义(训诂学)论文--现代词汇论文

中国企业微博道歉的语用学研究

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS第5-6页
ABSTRACT第6页
摘要第7-11页
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS第11-14页
CHPATER ONE INTRODUCTION第14-24页
    1.1 Introduction第14-15页
    1.2 Rationale of the present study第15-20页
        1.2.1 Definition of an apology第15-17页
        1.2.2 The reasons of collecting the corpus from Weibo第17-19页
        1.2.3 The relationship between AS and CP第19-20页
    1.3 Objectives of the present study第20-21页
    1.4 Organization of the present study第21-24页
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW第24-34页
    2.1 Three approaches to the study of apologies第24-30页
        2.1.1 Pragmatic approaches to apologies第24-25页
        2.1.2 Communication approaches to apologies第25-27页
        2.1.3 Cross-cultural approaches to apologies第27-28页
        2.1.4 Summary of these three approaches第28-30页
    2.2 An overview of studies on corporate apology strategies第30-34页
CHAPTER THREE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK第34-50页
    3.1 Theoretical background of the present thesis第34-42页
        3.1.1 The original meaning of Grice’s Cooperative Principle第34-36页
        3.1.2 Grice’s CP theory and the lexeme ‘cooperation ’第36-39页
        3.1.3 The applicability of CP in the present study第39-42页
    3.2 The conceptual framework of the present study第42-47页
        3.2.1 Categorizations of apology strategies第43-44页
        3.2.2 Explanations from the perspective of culture第44-47页
    3.3 The framework of the present study第47-50页
CHAPTER FOUR METHODOLOGY第50-54页
    4.1 Process of data collection第50-51页
    4.2 Process of data analysis第51-54页
CHAPTER FIVE COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES USED ON APOLOGY STRATEGIES第54-72页
    5.1 Identifying the characteristics of the apology strategies第54-66页
        5.1.1 The physical characteristics of apologies in this study第56-59页
        5.1.2 The physical manifestations of apology strategies in this study第59-66页
    5.2 The relationship between AS and CP in this study第66-72页
CHAPTER SIX DISCUSSION第72-84页
    6.1 The apology patterns in this study第73-75页
    6.2 The positive significant difference between Strategy B (E/A) and the maximof quality as well as manner第75-79页
    6.3 The negative significant difference between Strategy D (PF) and the maximof relevance第79-81页
    6.4 Collectivism among all strategies第81-84页
CHAPTER SEVEN CONCLUSION第84-92页
    7.1 Findings第84-88页
    7.2 Implications第88-89页
    7.3 Limitations and suggestions for further study第89-92页
        7.3.1 Limitations of the present study第89-90页
        7.3.2 Suggestions for further studies第90-92页
REFERENCES第92-96页
APPENDIX A第96-97页

论文共97页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:中英文酒店简介中互文性比较研究
下一篇:系统功能语言学下的花园路径现象研究