摘要 | 第3-4页 |
ABSTRACT | 第4-5页 |
List of Abbreviations | 第6-9页 |
Chapter One Introduction | 第9-13页 |
1.1 Background of the study | 第9-11页 |
1.1.1 The Significance of developing high school students' CT ability | 第9-10页 |
1.1.2 The reasons for choosing JS model with WD and argumentation writing as a case study | 第10-11页 |
1.2 Significance of the study | 第11-12页 |
1.3 Organization of the thesis | 第12-13页 |
Chapter Two Literature Review | 第13-29页 |
2.1 Critical Thinking | 第13-18页 |
2.1.1 Definition of CT | 第13页 |
2.1.2 CT skills | 第13-16页 |
2.1.3 Assessment methods on CT ability | 第16-18页 |
2.2 Jane Schaffer model | 第18-20页 |
2.2.1 The layout of Jane Schaffer model | 第18-19页 |
2.2.2 Arguments about Jane Schaffer model | 第19-20页 |
2.3 Writing Dynamic | 第20-24页 |
2.3.1 Definition of Writing Dynamic | 第20-21页 |
2.3.2 Application of writing dynamic into writing teaching | 第21-24页 |
2.4 Studies on the cultivation of critical thinking in EFL context | 第24-29页 |
2.4.1 Studies abroad | 第24-26页 |
2.4.2 Studies in China | 第26-29页 |
Chapter Three Research Methodology | 第29-41页 |
3.1 Research questions | 第29页 |
3.2 Subjects | 第29-30页 |
3.3 Instruments | 第30-31页 |
3.3.1 The Rating Scale of Critical Thinking Abilities in English Argumentative Writings | 第30-31页 |
3.3.2 Subjects' project compositions | 第31页 |
3.4 Research procedures | 第31-39页 |
3.4.1 The teaching of Jane Schaffer model | 第32-35页 |
3.4.2 The teaching to develop writing dynamics | 第35-39页 |
3.5 Data collection and data analysis approach | 第39-41页 |
3.5.1 Data collection | 第39页 |
3.5.2 Data analysis approach | 第39-41页 |
Chapter Four Results and Discussion | 第41-53页 |
4.1 Analysis of total scores and score gaps of the first project composition and the fourth one | 第41-47页 |
4.2 Analysis of the scores and score gaps of individual part in the first and fourth compositions in EG based on the rating scale | 第47-49页 |
4.3 Analysis of the correlation between the effectiveness of Jane Schaffer model with writing dynamics and subjects' English proficiency in EG | 第49-53页 |
Chapter Five Conclusion | 第53-57页 |
5.1 Findings | 第53页 |
5.2 Implications | 第53-55页 |
5.3 Limitations | 第55-57页 |
References | 第57-61页 |
Acknowledgements | 第61-62页 |
Appendix | 第62-67页 |
Appendix Ⅰ The Rating Scale of Critical Thinking Abilities in English Argumentative Writings | 第62-66页 |
Appendix Ⅱ Some Project Compositions Collected | 第66-67页 |