| 摘要 | 第4-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5页 |
| Acknowledgement | 第7-11页 |
| Abbreviations | 第11-12页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第12-17页 |
| 1.1 Rationale of the Research | 第12-14页 |
| 1.2 Objectives of the Study | 第14页 |
| 1.3 Methodology | 第14-15页 |
| 1.4 Layout of the thesis | 第15-17页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Revie | 第17-32页 |
| 2.1 Previous Studies on Word Class Categorization | 第17-18页 |
| 2.2 Previous Studies on Heterosemy | 第18-26页 |
| 2.2.1 Terms Related to Heterosemy | 第18-20页 |
| 2.2.2 Some Problems in the Identification of Heterosemy | 第20-24页 |
| 2.2.2.1 Perspective of ‘precategoriality’ or ‘underspecification’ | 第20-22页 |
| 2.2.2.2 The Principle of Parsimony | 第22-23页 |
| 2.2.2.3 Perspective of ‘noun includes verb’ pattern | 第23-24页 |
| 2.2.3 Representation of Heterosymy in Lexicography | 第24-26页 |
| 2.3 Previous Studies on Verb-Noun Heterosemy | 第26-30页 |
| 2.3.1 Identifying Verb-Noun Heterosemy | 第26-27页 |
| 2.3.2 Verb-Noun Heterosymy and Self-reference Usage | 第27-29页 |
| 2.3.3 Representation of Verb-Noun Heterosymy in Lexicography | 第29-30页 |
| 2.4 Summary | 第30-32页 |
| Chapter Three Theoretical Framework | 第32-45页 |
| 3.1 Introduction | 第32页 |
| 3.2 Two-Level Word Class Categorization Model | 第32-37页 |
| 3.2.1 The Background of Two-Level Word Class Categorization Model | 第32-34页 |
| 3.2.2 General Overview of Two-Level Word Class Categorization Model | 第34-36页 |
| 3.2.3 Empirical Studies from Two-Level Word Class Categorization Model | 第36-37页 |
| 3.2.3.1 Multiple Class Membership as a Characteristic of Analytic Languages | 第36页 |
| 3.2.3.2 The Correlation between Heterosemy and Frequency | 第36-37页 |
| 3.2.3.3 The Relationship between Construction and Lexical Entries | 第37页 |
| 3.3 Two-Level Word Class Categorization Model and Heterosemy | 第37-44页 |
| 3.3.1 Understanding Heterosemy | 第38-39页 |
| 3.3.2 Understanding Conversion | 第39-41页 |
| 3.3.3 Self-reference Usages and Self-reference Senses | 第41-44页 |
| 3.4 Summary | 第44-45页 |
| Chapter Four Research Design and Research Results | 第45-54页 |
| 4.1 Introduction | 第45页 |
| 4.2 Research Design | 第45-48页 |
| 4.3 Research Results | 第48-54页 |
| 4.3.1 The Distribution of Verb Lexemes, Noun Lexemes and Verb-noun Lexemes in theWhole Dictionary | 第48-49页 |
| 4.3.2 The Semantic Classification of Verb-noun Heterosemy’s Internal Composition | 第49-50页 |
| 4.3.3 The Definition Modes of Self-reference Sense | 第50-52页 |
| 4.3.4 The Internal Structure of Definition Type I | 第52-54页 |
| Chapter Five Discussion | 第54-67页 |
| 5.1 On the Representation of Verb-noun Heterosemy | 第54-55页 |
| 5.2 On Distinction between Heterosemy and Homonymy | 第55-56页 |
| 5.3 On the Representation of Self-reference Sense of Verb-noun Heterosemy | 第56-61页 |
| 5.3.1 The Necessity of Setting Self-reference Senses | 第56-58页 |
| 5.3.2 Theoretical Account on Definition Type I | 第58-60页 |
| 5.3.3 Theoretical Account on Definition Type Ⅳ | 第60-61页 |
| 5.4 Implications for Chinese Lexicography | 第61-67页 |
| 5.4.1 The Proper Way of Judging Verb-noun Heterosemy | 第61-62页 |
| 5.4.2 The Proper Way of Setting Self-reference Sense | 第62-63页 |
| 5.4.3 Case Study in Chinese Lexicography | 第63-67页 |
| Chapter Six Conclusion | 第67-71页 |
| 6.1 Major Findings of the Study | 第67-68页 |
| 6.2 Implications of the Study | 第68-69页 |
| 6.3 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Study | 第69-71页 |
| References | 第71-78页 |
| Appendix | 第78-101页 |
