首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--语法论文

系统功能语法视阈下的中美刑事判决书情态系统对比分析

摘要第4-5页
Abstract第5-6页
List of Abbreviations第9-12页
Chapter One Introduction第12-17页
    1.1 Research Background第12-14页
    1.2 Objectives of the Study第14页
    1.3 Significance of the Study第14-15页
    1.4 Layout of the Study第15-17页
Chapter Two Literature Review第17-28页
    2.1 The Notion of Modality第17-18页
    2.2 Previous Studies on Modality Abroad第18-20页
        2.2.1 Historical Review of Modality Study Abroad第18-19页
        2.2.2 Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar approach to Modality第19-20页
        2.2.3 Palmer's Theory from Semantic Angle第20页
    2.3 Previous Studies on Modality in China第20-22页
    2.4 Previous Studies on Legal Language第22-26页
        2.4.1 Unique Features of Legal Language第23-24页
        2.4.2 Previous Studies on Legal Language Abroad第24-25页
        2.4.3 Previous Studies on Legal Language in China第25-26页
    2.5 General Structure of Criminal Judgments第26-28页
        2.5.1 General Structure of American Criminal Judgments第26-27页
        2.5.2 General Structure of Chinese Criminal Judgments第27-28页
Chapter Three Theoretical Framework第28-40页
    3.1 Classifications of Modality from SFG Approach第28-32页
        3.1.1 Types of Modality第28-29页
        3.1.2 Values and Polarity of Modality第29-31页
        3.1.3 Orientation of Modality第31-32页
    3.2 The Main Linguistic Realization of Modality第32-38页
        3.2.1 The Main Linguistic Realization of Modality in English第32-35页
            3.2.1.1 Finite Modal Operator第32-33页
            3.2.1.2 Modal Adjuncts第33-35页
            3.2.1.3 Expansion of the Predicators第35页
            3.2.1.4 Metaphors of Modality第35页
        3.2.2 The Main Linguistic Realization of Modality in Chinese第35-38页
            3.2.2.1 Modal Verbs第36-37页
            3.2.2.2 Modal Adjuncts第37-38页
    3.3 Summary第38-40页
Chapter Four Research Methodology第40-44页
    4.1 Research Questions第40页
    4.2 Data Establishment and Description第40-42页
    4.3 Analysis Approaches and Instruments第42-44页
Chapter Five Findings and Discussions第44-64页
    5.1 Frequencies of Modal Expressions in American and Chinese Criminal Judgments第44-54页
        5.1.1 Comparison of Modal Operators in ACJ and CCJ第44-47页
        5.1.2 Comparison of Modal Adjuncts in ACJ and CCJ第47-51页
            5.1.2.1 Comparison of Mood Adjuncts in ACJ and CCJ第47-50页
            5.1.2.2 Comparison of Comment Adjuncts in ACJ and CCJ第50-51页
        5.1.3 Expansion of Predicators in ACJ第51-52页
        5.1.4 Metaphors of Modality in ACJ第52页
        5.1.5 Summary第52-54页
    5.2 Values of Modality in in American and Chinese Criminal Judgments第54-61页
        5.2.1 Modal Expressions of High Value in ACJ and CCJ第55-57页
        5.2.2 Modal Expressions of Medium Value in ACJ and CCJ第57-59页
        5.2.3 Modal Expressions of Low Value in ACJ and CCJ第59-61页
    5.3 Polarity of Modality in in American and Chinese Criminal Judgments第61-62页
    5.4 Orientation of Modality in in American and Chinese Criminal Judgments第62-64页
Chapter Six Conclusion第64-68页
    6.1 Major Findings of the Study第64-66页
    6.2 Implications of the study第66页
    6.3 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for Future Study第66-68页
References第68-73页
Acknowledgements第73页

论文共73页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:薇拉·凯瑟《我的安东尼亚》和《噢,拓荒者》中的女性主义思想研究
下一篇:任务复杂度对EFL课堂生—生互动的影响研究