| 摘要 | 第1-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5-9页 |
| Chapter 1 Introduction | 第9-22页 |
| ·Background of the Research | 第9-18页 |
| ·Rationalism vs Non-rationalism | 第11-15页 |
| ·Creation vs Evolution Theories | 第15-18页 |
| ·Significance of the Research | 第18-20页 |
| ·Organization of the Thesis | 第20-22页 |
| Chapter 2 Literature Review | 第22-33页 |
| ·Achievements of the Studies on NOL prior to the 20th Century | 第22-29页 |
| ·Present Situation of the Studies of the 20th Century NOL | 第29-33页 |
| Chapter 3 Development of NOL in the First Half of the 20th Century | 第33-50页 |
| ·Principal Philosophical NOL | 第33-42页 |
| ·Russell's NOL | 第33-37页 |
| ·L .Wittgenstein's NOL | 第37-40页 |
| ·Martin Heidegger's NOL | 第40-42页 |
| ·Leading Linguistic Schools | 第42-50页 |
| ·Saussure's Synchronic NOL | 第43-45页 |
| ·Bloomfield’s Synchronic and Diachronic NOL | 第45-46页 |
| ·Chomsky’s Diachronic NOL | 第46-50页 |
| Chapter 4 Significance of the 20th Century NOL for the Development of Linguistics | 第50-66页 |
| ·Significance of Principal Philosophical NOL | 第50-59页 |
| ·Significance of Russell's NOL | 第51-55页 |
| ·Significance of L .Wittgenstein's NOL | 第55-57页 |
| ·Significance of Martin Heidegger's NOL | 第57-59页 |
| ·Significance of Leading Linguistic Schools | 第59-66页 |
| ·Significance of Saussure's Synchronic NOL | 第59-61页 |
| ·Significance of Bloomfield’s Synchronic and Diachronic NOL | 第61-63页 |
| ·Significance of Chomsky’s Diachronic NOL | 第63-66页 |
| Chapter 5 Conclusion | 第66-74页 |
| ·Main Findings | 第66-71页 |
| ·Comparison Between Linguistic NOL and Philosophical NO | 第67-68页 |
| ·Contributions of Philosophical NOL to the Development of Linguistics | 第68-70页 |
| ·Contributions of Linguistic NOL to the Development of Philosophical NOL | 第70-71页 |
| ·Limitations of the Thesis | 第71-72页 |
| ·Suggestions for Future Research | 第72-74页 |
| References | 第74-80页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第80-81页 |
| Paper Published during Study | 第81-82页 |
