首页--语言、文字论文--汉语论文--语法论文--近代、现代语法论文--词类论文

汉语词典中反义复合词词类标注实证研究

摘要第4-5页
Abstract第5-6页
Acknowledgements第7-12页
Chapter One Introduction第12-18页
    1.1 Rationale of the Study第12-16页
    1.2 Objectives of the Study第16-17页
    1.3 Layout of the Thesis第17-18页
Chapter Two Literature Review第18-35页
    2.1 Previous Studies on Word Classes第18-26页
        2.1.1 Previous Studies on Origin and Criteria of Word Classes第18-23页
        2.1.2 Previous Studies on Multifunctionality第23-26页
    2.2 Previous Studies on Word Class Labeling in Chinese Dictionaries第26-29页
    2.3 Previous Studies on Antonymous Compounds第29-34页
        2.3.1 Definition of Antonymous Compounds in Chinese第29页
        2.3.2 Recognition of Opposite Sense Relationships第29-30页
        2.3.3 Relevant Researches on Antonymous Compounds第30-34页
    2.4 Summary第34-35页
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation第35-39页
    3.1 Theoretical Background of the Two-Level Word Class Categorization Theory第35-36页
        3.1.1 Language as a Complex Adaptive System第35页
        3.1.2 The Usage-Based Theory第35-36页
        3.1.3 Theory of Norms and Exploitations第36页
    3.2 Main Tenets of the Two-level Word Class Categorization Theory第36-38页
    3.3 Summary第38-39页
Chapter Four Research Design第39-44页
    4.1 The Selection of Dictionaries and Corpora第39-40页
    4.2 Data Collection第40-41页
    4.3 Data Processing第41-44页
Chapter Five Results and Discussion第44-68页
    5.1 Results第44-51页
        5.1.1 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds in CCD7 and in MCSD第44-47页
        5.1.2 The Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Based on Corpora第47-48页
        5.1.3 Comparative Survey of the Shared Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results第48-50页
        5.1.4 The Survey of Multi-category Lexemes and Their Frequency Ranks第50-51页
    5.2 Discussion第51-66页
        5.2.1 Discussion on the Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds第51-53页
        5.2.2 Causes of Improper Word Class Labeling第53-61页
            5.2.2.1 The Infeasibility of the “Principle of Parsimony”第53-59页
            5.2.2.2 The Misuse of Logic第59-61页
        5.2.3 The Basis of Word Class Labeling: Corpus-Based Usage Pattern Surveys with a Case Study第61-66页
    5.3 Summary第66-68页
Chapter Six Conclusion第68-71页
    6.1 Major Findings第68-69页
    6.2 Limitations of the Study第69-70页
    6.3 Suggestions for the Further Study第70-71页
References第71-77页
Appendices第77-93页
    Appendix 1 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of 264 Antonymous Compounds Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results第77-84页
    Appendix 2 Comparison of Word Class Labeling of Antonymous Compounds with Improper Word Class Labeling Among CCD7, MCSD3 and Corpus-based Results..第84-87页
    Appendix 3 The Frequency Ranks of 264 Shared Antonymous Compounds and Their Word Classes Based on Corpora第87-93页

论文共93页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:基于RED框架的“什么—”和“怎么—”汉语问答对话构式研究
下一篇:汉语成语隐喻语义梯度对词汇加工的影响--基于ERPs的研究