首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--写作、修辞论文

合作原则视角下《小王子》中的会话含意研究

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS第5-6页
ABSTRACT第6-7页
摘要第8-12页
Chapter One INTRODUCTION第12-17页
    1.1 Background of the Study第12-14页
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study第14-15页
    1.3 Research Questions and Methodology第15页
    1.4 Organizations of the Thesis第15-17页
Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW第17-27页
    2.1 Previous Studies on Literature Pragmatics第17-21页
        2.1.1 Previous Studies on Literary Pragmatics Abroad and at Home第17-19页
        2.1.2 Previous Study on Literary Works by Applying Cooperative Principle第19-21页
    2.2 Previous Studies on The Little Prince from Different Perspectives第21-25页
        2.2.1 Literary Criticism Perspective第21-22页
        2.2.2 Aesthetics Perspective第22-23页
        2.2.3 Inter-Subjectivity Perspective第23-24页
        2.2.4 Translatology Perspective第24页
        2.2.5 Linguistics Perspective第24-25页
    2.3 Limitations of the Previous Studies第25-27页
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS第27-42页
    3.1 Cooperative Principle第27-30页
    3.2 Violation of the Four Maxims第30-33页
        3.2.1 Violating the Maxim of Quantity第30页
        3.2.2 Violating the Maxim of Quality第30-31页
        3.2.3 Violating the Maxim of Relevance第31-32页
        3.2.4 Violating the Maxim of Manner第32-33页
    3.3 Conversational Implicature第33-38页
        3.3.1 Implicature第33-34页
        3.3.2 Classification of Implicature第34-35页
        3.3.3 Features of Implicature第35-38页
    3.4 Brown and Levinson's Politeness Theory第38-42页
Chapter Four STUDIES ON CHARACTERS' UTTERANCE IN THE LITTLE PRINCE第42-74页
    4.1 Conversational Implicature Created by Violating Quantity Maxim第42-51页
        4.1.1 Overstatement第43-49页
        4.1.2 Understatement第49-51页
    4.2 Conversational Implicature Created by Violating Quality Maxim第51-58页
        4.2.1 Hyperbole第55-56页
        4.2.2 Using Ironic第56-58页
    4.3 Conversational Implicature Created by Violating Relation Maxim第58-63页
        4.3.1 Giving Hints第59-62页
        4.3.2 Giving Association Clues第62-63页
    4.4 Conversational Implicature Created by Violating Manner Maxim第63-74页
        4.4.1 Obscurity第64-66页
        4.4.2 Ambiguity第66-68页
        4.4.3 Prolixity第68-72页
        4.4.4 Incompleteness第72-74页
Chapter Five CONCLUSION第74-79页
    5.1 Major Findings of the Research第74-76页
    5.2 Limitations of the Research第76-77页
    5.3 Suggestions for Further Research第77-79页
REFERENCES第79-83页
PUBLISHED PAPERS第83页

论文共83页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:特朗普和希拉里2016总统竞选演讲中的评价资源对比研究
下一篇:“里约奥运会”新闻报道中的概念隐喻对比研究--以《人民日报》和《华盛顿邮报》的报道为例