| CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION | 第1-17页 |
| ·RATIONALE FOR THE CHOICE OF SUBJECT MATTER | 第10-13页 |
| ·Why focusing on Legislative Discourse over Judicial Discourse | 第10-11页 |
| ·Focusing on Criminal Cases | 第11-12页 |
| ·Focusing on the Courtroom Investigation Stage | 第12页 |
| ·Focusing on the Domestic Scene | 第12-13页 |
| ·RATIONALE FOR THE CHOICE OF METHODOLOGY | 第13-15页 |
| ·RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND RESEARCH GOALS | 第15-16页 |
| ·ORGANIZATION OF THE PAPER | 第16-17页 |
| CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW | 第17-39页 |
| ·CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS | 第17-34页 |
| ·Defending Saussure against Fairclough | 第17-33页 |
| ·Valuable Perspectives from Fairclough | 第33-34页 |
| ·LEGISLATION ON THE LINGUISTIC ISSUES IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS | 第34-39页 |
| ·Linguistic Rights in Criminal Litigation | 第34-36页 |
| ·Linguistic Evidence | 第36-39页 |
| CHAPTER 3 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK | 第39-48页 |
| ·INFORMATION LOSS | 第39-42页 |
| ·Information Loss Due to Discrepancy in Langue Proficiency among Individuals with Normal Linguistic Potential | 第41-42页 |
| ·Information Loss Due to Enduring or Temporary Impairment of Linguistic Competence | 第42页 |
| ·A CDA MODEL FORANALYZING COURTROOM LINGUISTIC PHENOMENA | 第42-46页 |
| ·INFORMATION LOSS REDUCTION BY PROMOTING FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND IMPROVING LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE | 第46-48页 |
| CHAPTER 4 APPLICATION OF THE ANALYTIC MODEL | 第48-67页 |
| ·TRIAL RECORD IN THE CASE OF PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA VS. PENG GUOXI | 第48-62页 |
| ·ANALYSIS OF THE CASE | 第62-66页 |
| ·POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE LINGUISTIC STRATEGY FOR THE PRESIDING JUDGE IN THE PENG GUOXI CASE | 第66-67页 |
| CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION | 第67-71页 |
| ·SUMMARY OF THE PAPER | 第67-68页 |
| ·MAJOR FINDINGS | 第68-69页 |
| ·IMPLICATIONS OF THE STUDY | 第69页 |
| ·LIMITATION OF THE PAPER AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCHES | 第69-71页 |
| REFERENCES | 第71-73页 |
