首页--经济论文--世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理论文--世界经济、国际经济关系论文--国际经济组织与会议论文

How Can Differences in Use of Deliberative Outcomes in China and the EU Be Explained?

ABSTRACT第3页
1. INTRODUCTION第6-11页
    1.1 Research question第6-8页
    1.2 Hypothesis第8-10页
    1.3 Method and structure第10-11页
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK第11-23页
    2.1 Definitions of concepts used第11-16页
        2.1.1 Political participation and citizen participation第11-14页
        2.1.2 Deliberation and consultation第14-15页
        2.1.3 Authoritarian deliberation and deliberative authoritarianism第15-16页
        2.1.4 Deliberative democracy第16页
    2.2 Explanations for differences in use of citizen input第16-18页
    2.3 Determinants of the use of citizen input in policy第18-23页
        2.3.1 Prerequisites第19-20页
        2.3.2 Factors having a positive impact on the use of citizen input第20-21页
        2.3.3 Impact of elite attitudes and participants' competence第21-23页
3. DELIBERATION AND DECISION第23-38页
    3.1 Rationale for integrating deliberative outcomes in policy decisions第23-25页
    3.2 Problems with integrating deliberative outcomes in policy decision第25-31页
        3.2.1 Deliberation cannot be made into decision第25-27页
        3.2.2 Deliberation should not be made into decision第27-31页
    3.3 Deliberative polls and democracy第31-33页
    3.4 Deliberative polls-a substitute for democracy?第33-34页
    3.5 Possible institutionalization options第34-36页
    3.6 Chapter conclusions第36-38页
4. DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN CHINA AND THE WEST第38-55页
    4.1 Deliberation, consultation and deliberative polling in the EU第39-42页
    4.2 Deliberation, consultation and deliberative polling in China第42-55页
        4.2.1 Chinese conceptualizations of deliberative democracy第42-49页
        4.2.2 Chinese deliberation from the Maoist era into reform and opening up第49-51页
        4.2.3 Citizen participation in China today第51-52页
        4.2.4 Can deliberative democracy be operational in China?第52-55页
5. CASE STUDIES AND COMPARISON第55-75页
    5.1 Case studies第55-68页
        5.1.1 EuroPolis第56-61页
        5.1.2 Zeguo deliberative poll第61-68页
    5.2 Dynamics of resource exchanges explained by policy network theory第68-75页
        5.2.1 Structural differences between EuroPolis and Zeguo deliberative poll第68-69页
        5.2.2 Explaining differences using policy network theory第69-75页
6. CONCLUSIONS第75-78页
BIBLIOGRAPHY第78-82页

论文共82页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:促愈接骨汤配合夹板固定治疗Colles骨折的临床观察
下一篇:加减金刚丸治疗强直性脊柱炎肾阳亏虚证的临床观察