首页--政治、法律论文--法律论文

麦克唐纳德案中的实体性正当程序逆转--论斯卡利亚的保守权利观

Acknowledgement第5-8页
摘要第8-10页
Abstract第10-11页
Preface第13-14页
1. Introduction第14-23页
    1.1 Research Background第14-17页
    1.2 Research Purpose and Significance第17-18页
    1.3 Research Questions第18-19页
        Research questions of this thesis encompass the following:第18-19页
    1.4 Method,Structure and Contribution第19-23页
2. Scalia's Substantive Due Process Reversal in McDonald-A One-time Stunt or SeriousChange in Jurisprudence第23-26页
3. Motives for Scalia's Backtrack on Substantive Due Process Denial第26-31页
    3.1 Opting for Substantive Due Process as a Safeguard to the Heller Dicta第26-27页
    3.2 Letting Loose the Incorporation Doctrine in the name of "stability"第27-28页
    3.3 Watching out the Gate for More Individual Rights第28-31页
4. A Futile Attempt of Scalia's Scheme to Roll Back Individual Rights第31-40页
    4.1 Substantive Due Process Vicissitude第31-34页
    4.2 Hidebound by The Nebulous Concept of Tradition第34-36页
    4.3 Hobbled by the Upshots of Real Cases第36-40页
        4.3.1 Scuttled at Obergefell on Same-sex Marriage第37-38页
        4.3.2 Recant on the Substantive Due Process Clause第38页
        4.3.3 Crestfallen for Future Comeback第38-40页
5. The Future of Originalism as a Revelation of Scalia's Reversal on Substantive DueProcess第40-45页
    5.1 Depreciation of Originalism as a Creed第40-42页
    5.2 Appreciation of Originalism as an Approach第42-44页
    5.3 Potential Leveling Ground on Originalism第44-45页
6. Scalia's Narrow Interpretation of Liberty第45-49页
    6.1 "Structure Is Destiny"-Scalia's Unbalanced Partiality to the Constitution第45页
    6.2 Scalia's Unbalanced Partiality to the Constitution第45-46页
    6.3 Scalia's Partial Incorporation of Liberties in the Bill of Rights第46-47页
    6.4 Scalia's Inconsistent Originalist Approach in Conferring Rights第47-49页
7. Conclusion第49-52页
    7.1 Findings第49页
    7.2 Implications第49-51页
    7.3 Recommendations and Limitations第51-52页
Works Cited第52-60页

论文共60页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:重复供述的证据能力研究
下一篇:美国对华反补贴外部基准适用问题研究