Acknowledgement | 第5-8页 |
摘要 | 第8-10页 |
Abstract | 第10-11页 |
Preface | 第13-14页 |
1. Introduction | 第14-23页 |
1.1 Research Background | 第14-17页 |
1.2 Research Purpose and Significance | 第17-18页 |
1.3 Research Questions | 第18-19页 |
Research questions of this thesis encompass the following: | 第18-19页 |
1.4 Method,Structure and Contribution | 第19-23页 |
2. Scalia's Substantive Due Process Reversal in McDonald-A One-time Stunt or SeriousChange in Jurisprudence | 第23-26页 |
3. Motives for Scalia's Backtrack on Substantive Due Process Denial | 第26-31页 |
3.1 Opting for Substantive Due Process as a Safeguard to the Heller Dicta | 第26-27页 |
3.2 Letting Loose the Incorporation Doctrine in the name of "stability" | 第27-28页 |
3.3 Watching out the Gate for More Individual Rights | 第28-31页 |
4. A Futile Attempt of Scalia's Scheme to Roll Back Individual Rights | 第31-40页 |
4.1 Substantive Due Process Vicissitude | 第31-34页 |
4.2 Hidebound by The Nebulous Concept of Tradition | 第34-36页 |
4.3 Hobbled by the Upshots of Real Cases | 第36-40页 |
4.3.1 Scuttled at Obergefell on Same-sex Marriage | 第37-38页 |
4.3.2 Recant on the Substantive Due Process Clause | 第38页 |
4.3.3 Crestfallen for Future Comeback | 第38-40页 |
5. The Future of Originalism as a Revelation of Scalia's Reversal on Substantive DueProcess | 第40-45页 |
5.1 Depreciation of Originalism as a Creed | 第40-42页 |
5.2 Appreciation of Originalism as an Approach | 第42-44页 |
5.3 Potential Leveling Ground on Originalism | 第44-45页 |
6. Scalia's Narrow Interpretation of Liberty | 第45-49页 |
6.1 "Structure Is Destiny"-Scalia's Unbalanced Partiality to the Constitution | 第45页 |
6.2 Scalia's Unbalanced Partiality to the Constitution | 第45-46页 |
6.3 Scalia's Partial Incorporation of Liberties in the Bill of Rights | 第46-47页 |
6.4 Scalia's Inconsistent Originalist Approach in Conferring Rights | 第47-49页 |
7. Conclusion | 第49-52页 |
7.1 Findings | 第49页 |
7.2 Implications | 第49-51页 |
7.3 Recommendations and Limitations | 第51-52页 |
Works Cited | 第52-60页 |