Acknowledgements | 第3-4页 |
摘要 | 第4-5页 |
Abstract | 第5页 |
Chapter Ⅰ Introduction | 第7-8页 |
1.1 Background | 第7页 |
1.2 Research Objective | 第7-8页 |
Chapter Ⅱ Literature Review | 第8-12页 |
2.1 Global Attention on the AIIB | 第8-10页 |
2.2 Research Questions | 第10页 |
2.3 News Value | 第10-12页 |
Chapter Ⅲ Research Method | 第12-19页 |
3.1 Content Analysis | 第12-13页 |
3.2 Data Collection | 第13页 |
3.3 Design of Coding Sheet | 第13-19页 |
3.3.1 Publication Date | 第14页 |
3.3.2 Reported Places | 第14-15页 |
3.3.3 Writing Styles | 第15-16页 |
3.3.4 News Sources | 第16-17页 |
3.3.5 Topics | 第17-18页 |
3.3.6 The Tones Adopted by the FT and WSJ | 第18-19页 |
3.4 Data Analysis | 第19页 |
Chapter Ⅳ Results | 第19-43页 |
4.1. The Differences in Publication Date between FT and WSJ | 第19-21页 |
4.2 Analysis of Reported Places | 第21-23页 |
4.3 Analysis of Writing Styles | 第23-25页 |
4.4 Analysis of News Sources | 第25-28页 |
4.4.1 Analysis of Anonymous Sources | 第26-27页 |
4.4.2 Analysis of the Frequency of News Sources | 第27-28页 |
4.5 Analysis of the Topics about the AIIB | 第28-37页 |
4.5.1 The Overall Analysis of the Topics about the AIIB on FT and WSJ | 第28-29页 |
4.5.2 A Comparison between FT and WSJ on the Topics They Reported | 第29-30页 |
4.5.3 Specific Analysis of the Six Groups of Topics | 第30-37页 |
4.6 Analysis of Tones Adopted by FT and WSJ | 第37-43页 |
4.6.1 Analysis on the Positive Articles Published by FT and WSJ | 第39-40页 |
4.6.2 Analysis of the Negative Articles Published by FT and WSJ | 第40-43页 |
Chapter Ⅴ Discussion | 第43-46页 |
5.1 The Discrepancy in Publication Date and Reported Places | 第43-44页 |
5.2 The Discrepancy in Articles' Writing Styles | 第44页 |
5.3 The Discrepancy in News Sources Quoted by FT and WSJ | 第44-45页 |
5.4 The Discrepancy in News Topics Reported by FT and WSJ | 第45页 |
5.5 The Discrepancy in Tones Adopted by FT and WSJ | 第45-46页 |
Chapter Ⅵ Conclusion | 第46-48页 |
6.1 Limitations | 第47-48页 |
6.2 Future Research | 第48页 |
References | 第48-50页 |
Appendix I | 第50-51页 |
Appendix II | 第51页 |