| Acknowledgement | 第3-4页 |
| 摘要 | 第4-6页 |
| ABSTRACT | 第6-7页 |
| Introduction | 第9-14页 |
| Chapter 1 Literature Review | 第14-28页 |
| 1.1 Apology: Definition, Criteria, Problems and Justification | 第14-20页 |
| 1.1.1 Shift in Meaning | 第14-15页 |
| 1.1.2 Criteria for Authenticity | 第15-17页 |
| 1.1.3 Challenges Faced | 第17-18页 |
| 1.1.4 Political and Moral Significance | 第18-20页 |
| 1.2 Interrelationship:Apology, Truth, Reconciliation, and Reparation | 第20-23页 |
| 1.3 Apology as a Global Trend | 第23-25页 |
| 1.4 Reflections | 第25-28页 |
| Chapter 2 Comparison on Apology | 第28-46页 |
| 2.1 Australia:Can government apologize without taking accountability? | 第28-33页 |
| 2.2 Canada: Can state apologize for non-state actors? | 第33-38页 |
| 2.3 Taiwan:Should government apologize for "foreign" regimes? | 第38-44页 |
| 2.4 Similarities and Differences | 第44-46页 |
| Chapter 3 Comparison on Background | 第46-64页 |
| 3.1 Australia:White Supremacy, Liberal Individualism,Impediments to Apology | 第46-51页 |
| 3.2 Canada:From Dualism to Multiculturalism | 第51-56页 |
| 3.3 Taiwan: Colonization, Transplantation, Indigenization | 第56-64页 |
| Chapter 4 Comparison on Policy | 第64-76页 |
| Chapter 5 Conclusion | 第76-81页 |
| References | 第81-89页 |
