首页--政治、法律论文--法律论文--国际法论文--领土论文--海洋法论文

马约特岛的法律地位:法国的海外领地还是科摩罗的分离领土?

Abstract第3-4页
摘要第5-7页
Dedication第7-8页
Acknowledgements第8-21页
List of Abbreviations and Symbols第21-23页
General Introduction第23-32页
Part 1 : The Comorian people's right to self-determination第32-107页
    Chapter 1: The colonisation period of the archipelago of Comoros第34-54页
        1.1. The archipelago of Comoros under French protectorate regime第35-41页
            1.1.1. Establishment of the protectorate regime in Comoros第36-38页
            1.1.2. The contestation of the protectorate regime第38-41页
        1.2. The new status of Comoros:the French colony第41-47页
            1.2.1. The annexation Act and its scope第42-44页
            1.2.2. The contestation of the attachment第44-47页
        1.3. The internal autonomy of Comoros:the way to independence第47-54页
            1.3.1. The phase of the administrative and financial autonomy第48-50页
            1.3.2. The framework law of 1956第50页
            1.3.3. The Internal autonomy of Comoros第50-54页
    Chapter 2: Accession of Comoros into independence第54-106页
        2.1. General view of self-determination第55-79页
            2.1.1. Historical perspective of the right to self-determination第55-76页
                2.1.1.1. Self-determination before the First World War第56-59页
                2.1.1.2. Self-determination after the First World War第59-66页
                2.1.1.3. Self-determination under the international law jargon第66-76页
                    2.1.1.3.1. Self-determination under aegis of articles 1 § 2 and 55 of the UNCharter第66-68页
                    2.1.1.3.2. The UN General Assembly Resolutions 1514 (XV) and 1541(XV)第68-70页
                    2.1.1.3.3. The International Covenants of 1966第70-71页
                    2.1.1.3.4. The Declaration on Friendly Relations第71-73页
                    2.1.1.3.5. The African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights第73-74页
                    2.1.1.3.6. The Helsinki Final Act第74页
                    2.1.1.3.7. The Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice第74-76页
            2.1.2. Different meanings and forms of self-determination第76-79页
                2.1.2.1. Self-determination: right or principle?第76-77页
                2.1.2.2. Different forms of the right of people to self-determination第77-79页
                    2.1.2.2.1. External self-determination第77-78页
                    2.1.2.2.2. Internal self-determination第78-79页
        2.2. Comoros' self-determination第79-101页
            2.2.1. The conditions to implement the right to self-determination in Comoros第79-87页
                2.2.1.1. The quality of Comorian people:the subjugated people第80-85页
                2.2.1.2. The colonial domination第85-87页
            2.2.2. The operation of self-determination of Comoros第87-96页
                2.2.2.1. The organisation of referendum of 22 December 1974第88-96页
                    2.2.2.1.1. The political bases of self-determination in Comoros第89-91页
                    2.2.2.1.2. The legal basis of self-determination referendum of Comoros第91-94页
                    2.2.2.1.3. The popular consultation of 22 December 1974第94-96页
            2.2.3. The political and legal consequences of the self-determination referendumof 22 December 1974第96-101页
                2.2.3.1. The failure of the decolonisation process of Comoros caused by the Parliament第96-99页
                2.2.3.2. The unilateral declaration of independence of Comoros第99-101页
        2.3. The recognition of independence of Comoros第101-106页
            2.3.1. The recognition by the ex-colonial power第102-103页
            2.3.2. The recognition by the international community第103-106页
    Conclusion of the first part第106-107页
Part 2: Mayotte:French Overseas Department or dismemberment of Comoros?第107-153页
    Chapter 3: Does the island of Mayotte have a separated right to self-determination?第108-127页
        3.1. Do wa maore comtitute people other than the people of Comoros?第109-114页
        3.2. Does the population of Mayotte have the right to refuse independence?第114-127页
            3.2.1. There is no right to refuse independence第115-120页
            3.2.2. Mayotte's theses against independence第120-127页
                3.2.2.1. The "realities" of Mayotte's attachment to France第120-123页
                3.2.2.2. The truth about Mayotte's attachment to France第123-127页
    Chapter 4: Scope and limits to the self-determination of Mayotte第127-152页
        4.1. Mayotte's right to self-determination is subject to the territorial integrity of Comoros第127-137页
            4.1.1. The principle of territorial integrity in international law第128-133页
            4.1.2. Wa maore's right to self-determination and the principle of the territorial integrity of Comoros第133-137页
                4.1.2.1. Self-determination of Comoros cannot be plural第134-136页
                4.1.2.2. Self-determination of Comoros involves the preservation of the territorial integrity of the Comorian overseas territory第136-137页
        4.2. The principle of the right of peoples to self-determination does not meansecession第137-140页
        4.3. The prohibition of the secession第140-152页
            4.3.1. The prohibition of secession in international law第141-143页
            4.3.2. The exception of the prohibition: the remedial secession第143-148页
                4.3.2.1. The constitutional right to secession第144-145页
                4.3.2.2. The remedial secession第145-148页
            4.3.3. International practice against secessions:the case of Comoros第148-152页
    Conclusion of the second part第152-153页
Part 3: France's non-compliance with international law第153-202页
    Chapter 5: The violation by France of the Vienna Convention of the Law of Treaties of 1969第154-176页
        5.1. Violation of the Vienna Convention of 1969第155-166页
            5.1.1. The violation of article 26 of the Vienne Convention of 1969第155-161页
                5.1.1.1. Rule of good faith第156-160页
                5.1.1.2. The violation of the rule of good faith in the Comoros' self-determination process第160-161页
            5.1.2. The violation of article 27 of the Vienne Convention of 1969第161-166页
        5.2. The questionable position of France enshrined in the decision of 31 December 1975 on the self-determination of Comoros第166-176页
            5.2.1. Determination of the modalities for the implementation of article 53 of the France Constitution of 1958第166-170页
            5.2.2. The erroneous assertion of respect for international rules第170-176页
    Chapter 6: France's non-compliance with international law第176-200页
        6.1. France's violation of the principle of uti possidetis juris第177-185页
            6.1.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law第177-182页
            6.1.2. The principle of uti possidetis juris in the case of Comoros第182-185页
        6.2. Permanent interference in the internal affairs of Comoros by France第185-200页
            6.2.1. The meaning of the principle of uti possidetis juris in international law第186-190页
            6.2.2. Comoros' internal affairs violated by France第190-200页
                6.2.2.1. The mercenary phenomena in Comoros第191-193页
                6.2.2.2. The deportation of President SAID MOHAMED DJOHAR第193-197页
                6.2.2.3. The affair MOHAMED BACAR第197-200页
    Conclusion of the third part第200-202页
Part 4: The way forward to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte第202-240页
    Chapter 7: Sharing the sovereignty on Mayotte between Comoros and France:the condominium theory第204-226页
        7.1. The concept of condominium in international law第205-218页
            7.1.1. The general meaning of sovereignty in international law第205-207页
            7.1.2. The absolutism State sovereignty and its limits: the limitation of sovereignty and the sharing of sovereignty第207-211页
            7.1.3. Sharing sovereignty, an exceptional notion in international law:the condominium第211-218页
        7.2. Different perspectives of sharing sovereignty and competences第218-226页
            7.2.1. Comorian sovereignty, French administration第219-220页
            7.2.2. One sovereignty, two administrations第220-226页
    Chapter 8: The implication of the United Nations bodies to settle the Franco-Comorian territorial dispute over Mayotte第226-238页
        8.1. Request of an advisory opinion before International Court of Justice第227-232页
        8.2. Seizing the United Nations Security Council第232-235页
        8.3. Forum prorogatum第235-238页
    Conclusion of the fourth part第238-240页
Part 5: General Conclusion & Recommendations第240-247页
    Chapter 9: Conclusion第241-244页
    Chapter 10: Recommendations第244-247页
        10.1. The Comorian government must have a strong national policy on thisquestion第244-245页
        10.2. Promoting the country's economic development第245-246页
        10.3. France's policy to be improved第246-247页
Bibliography第247-264页
    Books & theses第247-253页
    Articles & newspaper column第253-258页
    Cited Cases第258-260页
    Treaties,Conventions and Declarations第260-261页
    Security Council Resolutions第261页
    General Assembly Resolutions第261-262页
    Organisation of African Unity and African Union Resolutions第262页
    National Constitutions, Domestic Legislations第262-263页
    Website第263-264页
Annexe Ⅰ第264页

论文共264页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:国际法中的种族灭绝罪--以亚美尼亚大屠杀为例
下一篇:湖北省被征地农民养老风险与策略