| ABSTRACT | 第4-5页 |
| 摘要 | 第6-8页 |
| ANKNOWLEDGEMENT | 第8-13页 |
| 1. Introduction | 第13-18页 |
| 2. The Crime of Genocide from the perspective of the Armenian Genocide | 第18-29页 |
| 2.1. The Concept of Genocide | 第18-19页 |
| 2.2. Research on the constitutive elements of the crime of genocide | 第19-24页 |
| 2.2.1. The subjective and objective aspects of Genocide | 第19-21页 |
| 2.2.2. State Responsibility of Genocide | 第21-24页 |
| 2.3. An analysis of the relationship between crimes against humanity and crimes ofGenocide | 第24-25页 |
| 2.4. Analysis on the sources of the two crimes in International Law, punishment andprecautionary measures | 第25-27页 |
| 2.5. The Armenian Genocide: A problem of Criminal Law? | 第27-29页 |
| 3. The international influence and legal acts on the Armenian massacre | 第29-48页 |
| 3.1. Prelude to the Armenian massacre | 第29-36页 |
| 3.1.1. The concept of the Armenian Genocide | 第30-32页 |
| 3.1.2. The course of the massacre | 第32-34页 |
| 3.1.3. Event summary and | 第34-36页 |
| 3.2. The international influence on the act of genocide | 第36-40页 |
| 3.2.1. The Development of World War | 第37-38页 |
| 3.2.2. The Ruling of Nuremberg and Humanitarian Intervention to Armenia | 第38-40页 |
| 3.3. International Customary Law and the Armenian Massacre | 第40-46页 |
| 3.3.1. The narrow sense and wide range of de fact & de jure | 第41-43页 |
| 3.3.2. Tests for Customary international Law | 第43-44页 |
| 3.3.3. Diuturnitas: Formation of Customary Law | 第44-45页 |
| 3.3.4. The Psychological Element, OPINION JURIS SIVE NECESSITATIS | 第45-46页 |
| 3.4. Analysis on the Importance of development of the Genocide act prevention andprevention peculations of the International Law for the Armenian Holocaust matter | 第46-48页 |
| 4. Military tribunals and international trials of the Armenian massacre | 第48-62页 |
| 4.1. Military tribunals and the Courts-Martial | 第48-51页 |
| 4.1.1. The Pre-trial Investigations | 第48-49页 |
| 4.1.2. The establishment of the Courts-Martial | 第49-50页 |
| 4.1.3. An Analysis on the Jurisdictional Challenge | 第50-51页 |
| 4.2. Treaties signed after the Armenian massacre | 第51-59页 |
| 4.2.1. Armistice agreement of 1918 | 第51-52页 |
| 4.2.2. The Istanbul Trials | 第52-55页 |
| 4.2.3. The Treaty of Sevres | 第55-57页 |
| 4.2.4. Treaty of Moscow and Kars | 第57-59页 |
| 4.3. Further Analysis on the Prosecution decisions of the International tribunals on thepractice and remedial actions on the Armenian Genocide | 第59-60页 |
| 4.4. Conclusion on Importance of the treaties and trials in relation with the ArmenianHolocaust | 第60-62页 |
| 5. Prevention and punishment of the crime of Genocide | 第62-92页 |
| 5.1. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide 1948, Dec9 | 第62-63页 |
| 5.2. 1948 Genocide Convention in relation to the Armenian Massacre | 第63-66页 |
| 5.3. Applicability of the United Nations Genocide Convention | 第66-83页 |
| 5.3.1. The Genocide Convention a Declaratory of Pre-Existing International Law? | 第67-71页 |
| 5.3.2. Non-Prescription of the crime of Genocide | 第71-81页 |
| 5.3.3. Universal Jurisdiction and the Protective Principle | 第81-83页 |
| 5.4. A deep Analysis of the issue of "punishment" of the responsible state or individual | 第83-86页 |
| 5.4.1. Punishment | 第83-84页 |
| 5.4.2. How to Determine a Responsible State or Individual | 第84-86页 |
| 5.5. International Criminal Tribunals | 第86-92页 |
| 5.5.1. ICTY & ICTR | 第87-89页 |
| 5.5.2. Research on the Necessity for the creation of the ICTA and it possible influenceon the recognition and pumishment of the Armenian Massacre | 第89-92页 |
| 6. Arrangement and Remedies for compensation of the Armenian Genocide in InternationalLaw | 第92-164页 |
| 6.1. What were the harms inflicted through the Armenian Genocide? | 第92-100页 |
| 6.2. Are Reparations in International Law and the Armenian case related? | 第100-132页 |
| 6.2.1. General Legal Considerations for property seizure within context of humanrights abuse | 第103-106页 |
| 6.2.2. Application of the United Nation's Genocide Convention | 第106-125页 |
| 6.2.3. The Doctrine of State succession | 第125-127页 |
| 6.2.4. The right to restitution has not lapsed due to the deaths of potential claimants ortime passage | 第127-131页 |
| 6.2.5. From International Law to Domestic Cases | 第131-132页 |
| 6.3. Genocide Recognition by the international tribunes | 第132-142页 |
| 6.3.1. States and Organizations officially recognizing the Armenian Genocide | 第132-133页 |
| 6.3.2. The United Nations Resolution | 第133-134页 |
| 6.3.3. The EU Parliament Resolution on the Armenian Holocaust | 第134-142页 |
| 6.4. Can the Armenian state place financial and territorial claims on compensation? | 第142-146页 |
| 6.5. What shall be the Compensation claims for the victims of the Armenian Holocaust | 第146-164页 |
| 6.5.1. Who should bear the cost of Material Repair | 第148页 |
| 6.5.2. How should Material reparations be distributed? | 第148-151页 |
| 6.5.3. Determining the territory to be returned and its post-reparations status | 第151-159页 |
| 6.5.4. Calculation of compensation for unavailable movable property and for deathand suffering | 第159-164页 |
| Conclusion | 第164-166页 |
| References | 第166-170页 |
| Cases | 第170-171页 |
| Treaties, Legislation and Reports | 第171页 |
| METHODOLOGY FOR THE RESEARCH | 第171-172页 |
| The author’s introduction and achievements in scientific research | 第172页 |
