| Acknowledgements | 第6-8页 |
| 摘要 | 第8-10页 |
| Abstract | 第10-12页 |
| Chapter One Introduction | 第21-29页 |
| 1.1 Psychotherapy: Terms and Demarcations | 第21-22页 |
| 1.2 Motivation | 第22-27页 |
| 1.2.1 Personal Experience | 第23-25页 |
| 1.2.2 Research Prospect | 第25-26页 |
| 1.2.3 Practice Concern | 第26-27页 |
| 1.3 Organization of the Dissertation | 第27-29页 |
| Chapter Two Literature Review | 第29-68页 |
| 2.1 Introduction | 第29-31页 |
| 2.2 T-C Interaction in Psychotherapeutic Talk: CA Approach | 第31-56页 |
| 2.2.1 Preliminary Study on Psychotherapeutic Discourse | 第31-33页 |
| 2.2.2 Fundamental Conversational Practices in Psychotherapy | 第33-53页 |
| 2.2.2.1 Formulation Sequence | 第33-43页 |
| 2.2.2.2 Interpretation Sequence | 第43-49页 |
| 2.2.2.3 Questioning Sequence | 第49-53页 |
| 2.2.3 Dynamic of T-C Interaction | 第53-56页 |
| 2.3 T-C Interaction in Psychotherapeutic Talk: SFL Approach | 第56-59页 |
| 2.4 T-C Interaction in Psychotherapeutic Talk: Pragmatic Approach | 第59-62页 |
| 2.5 Evaluation of Interaction Studies in Psychotherapeutic Talk | 第62-66页 |
| 2.5.1 Evaluation of Main Approaches | 第62-63页 |
| 2.5.2 Evaluation of Studies on Chinese Psychotherapeutic Talk | 第63-66页 |
| 2.6 Summary | 第66-68页 |
| Chapter Three Methodology | 第68-90页 |
| 3.1 Introduction | 第68页 |
| 3.2 Methodology of Conversation Analysis | 第68-82页 |
| 3.2.1 Theoretical Background | 第68-72页 |
| 3.2.2 Basic Analytical Components | 第72-76页 |
| 3.2.2.1 Turn-Taking System | 第72-74页 |
| 3.2.2.2 Sequence Organization | 第74-76页 |
| 3.2.3 CA and Institutional Talk | 第76-79页 |
| 3.2.3.1 Features of Institutional Talk | 第76-77页 |
| 3.2.3.2 Dimensions of Analyzing Institutional Talk | 第77-79页 |
| 3.2.4 Basic Conversation Analytic Method | 第79-82页 |
| 3.2.4.1 Using Naturally Occurring Data | 第79-80页 |
| 3.2.4.2 Data Analysis Procedure | 第80-82页 |
| 3.3 Research Design of Present Study | 第82-89页 |
| 3.3.1 Data Collection | 第82-86页 |
| 3.3.1.1 Data Source | 第84页 |
| 3.3.1.2 Data Description | 第84-86页 |
| 3.3.2 Data Transcription | 第86-87页 |
| 3.3.3 Data Analysis | 第87-88页 |
| 3.3.4 Research Questions | 第88-89页 |
| 3.4 Summary | 第89-90页 |
| Chapter Four Sequential Organization of Psychotherapy: Towards a TripartitePerspective of Emotion, Epistemics and Deontics | 第90-151页 |
| 4.1 Introduction | 第90-91页 |
| 4.2 Theoretical Rationale from SFL Perspective | 第91-99页 |
| 4.2.1 Overview | 第91-93页 |
| 4.2.2 Epistemics and Deontics vis-à-vis Modality | 第93-97页 |
| 4.2.3 Emotion vis-à-vis Appraisal of Affect | 第97-99页 |
| 4.3 Theoretical Rationale from CA Perspective | 第99-125页 |
| 4.3.1 Emotion | 第99-103页 |
| 4.3.1.1 Gestalt and Multimodal Display of Emotion | 第100页 |
| 4.3.1.2 Affiliation vs. Alignment | 第100-103页 |
| 4.3.1.3 Emotional Status vs. Emotional Stance | 第103页 |
| 4.3.2 Epistemics | 第103-117页 |
| 4.3.2.1 Epistemic Status | 第104-108页 |
| 4.3.2.2 Epistemic Stance | 第108-117页 |
| 4.3.3 Deontics | 第117-125页 |
| 4.3.3.1 Entitlement vs. Contingency | 第119-122页 |
| 4.3.3.2 Deontic Authority | 第122-124页 |
| 4.3.3.3 Deontic Status vs. Deontic Stance | 第124-125页 |
| 4.4 Theoretical Model of Three Orders in Social Relations | 第125-128页 |
| 4.5 Sequential Organization of Psychotherapeutic Talk | 第128-149页 |
| 4.5.1 Overall Structural Organization of Psychotherapeutic Talk | 第129-141页 |
| 4.5.1.1 Problem Presentation | 第131-132页 |
| 4.5.1.2 Problem Interpretation | 第132-136页 |
| 4.5.1.3 Problem Intervention | 第136-138页 |
| 4.5.1.4 Three Phases across Sessions | 第138-141页 |
| 4.5.2 Institutional Features of Psychotherapeutic Talk | 第141-146页 |
| 4.5.2.1 Tripartite Perspective of Emotion, Epistemicsand Deontics | 第141-142页 |
| 4.5.2.2 Sequential Organization of Emotion, Epistemics and Deontics | 第142-146页 |
| 4.5.3 Conceptual Framework of Psychotherapeutic Talk | 第146-149页 |
| 4.6 Summary | 第149-151页 |
| Chapter Five Emotional Affiliation in Problem Presentation | 第151-203页 |
| 5.1 Introduction | 第151页 |
| 5.2 Managing Troubles-telling in Different Phases: From Affiliation toDisaffiliation | 第151-157页 |
| 5.3 Congruence of Alignment and Affiliation | 第157-159页 |
| 5.3.1 Acknowledgment Tokens | 第157-158页 |
| 5.3.2 Change-of-State Tokens | 第158-159页 |
| 5.4 Incongruence of Alignment and Affiliation | 第159-174页 |
| 5.4.1 Interpretations | 第159-168页 |
| 5.4.2 Pre-Emptive Turn Completions | 第168-174页 |
| 5.4.2.1 Pre-Emptive Turn Completions without Overlaps | 第169-170页 |
| 5.4.2.2 Pre-Emptive Turn Completions with Overlaps | 第170-174页 |
| 5.5 Preference Organization of Assessments | 第174-186页 |
| 5.6 Managing Emotional Asymmetries: Empathy, Self-Exposure and Affiliation | 第186-201页 |
| 5.6.1 Empathy as Default Practice | 第187-189页 |
| 5.6.2 Departure from Default Practice: Self-Exposure as Affiliation | 第189-201页 |
| 5.6.2.1 Disclosing Personal Outer Experiences | 第190-192页 |
| 5.6.2.2 Disclosing Personal Inner Experiences | 第192-198页 |
| 5.6.2.3 Disclosing Personal Opinions | 第198-201页 |
| 5.7 Summary | 第201-203页 |
| Chapter Six Epistemic Authority in Problem Interpretation | 第203-267页 |
| 6.1 Introduction | 第203页 |
| 6.2 Congruence of Epistemic Status and Epistemic Stance | 第203-218页 |
| 6.2.1 Therapists Displaying Epistemic Authority on Professional Domain: Problem Identification | 第204-215页 |
| 6.2.1.1 Explicating Evidence of Problem Identification | 第206-213页 |
| 6.2.1.2 Implying Evidence of Problem Identification | 第213-215页 |
| 6.2.2 Clients Displaying Epistemic Authority on Personal Domain | 第215-218页 |
| 6.2.2.1 Disagreement | 第216-217页 |
| 6.2.2.2 Elaboration | 第217-218页 |
| 6.3 Incongruence of Epistemic Status and Epistemic Stance | 第218-240页 |
| 6.3.1 Therapists Orienting to Epistemic Authority on Clients’ Domain: Problem Construction | 第219-238页 |
| 6.3.1.1Questioning-ClarifyingFormulation/Interpretation-Questioning Sequence | 第220-224页 |
| 6.3.1.2 Questioning-Diagnostic Formulation/InterpretationSequence | 第224-228页 |
| 6.3.1.3 Socratic Questioning-Assessment | 第228-232页 |
| 6.3.1.4 Formulation/Interpretation-Questioning Sequence | 第232-238页 |
| 6.3.2 Clients Orienting to Epistemic Authority on Therapists’ Domain | 第238-240页 |
| 6.4 Negotiations of Epistemic Responsibilities and Primacy | 第240-249页 |
| 6.4.1 Negotiating Epistemic Responsibilities: Whose Domain Is It? | 第241-246页 |
| 6.4.1.1 Display of K- Stance | 第242页 |
| 6.4.1.2 Question-Question-Answer Sequence | 第242-243页 |
| 6.4.1.3 Explicit Uptake of Clients’ Prior Action | 第243-245页 |
| 6.4.1.4 Referring to Clients’ Personal Domain | 第245-246页 |
| 6.4.2 Claiming Epistemic Primacy: Owning the Problem | 第246-249页 |
| 6.5 Managing Asymmetries on Epistemic Seesaw: Authority and Agency | 第249-265页 |
| 6.5.1 Single Case Analysis | 第250-263页 |
| 6.5.2 Concluding Remarks | 第263-265页 |
| 6.6 Summary | 第265-267页 |
| Chapter Seven Deontic Authority in Problem Intervention | 第267-298页 |
| 7.1 Introduction | 第267页 |
| 7.2 Managing Deontic Right in Different Phases: Responses in Advice-SeekingSequences | 第267-276页 |
| 7.3 Managing Deontic Authority in Different Phases: From Low Entitlement toHigh Entitlement | 第276-284页 |
| 7.4 Advice-Giving Sequences in Problem Intervention | 第284-297页 |
| 7.4.1 Pre-Expansions | 第284-287页 |
| 7.4.2 Base Sequences | 第287-297页 |
| 7.4.2.1 First Pair Parts | 第287-290页 |
| 7.4.2.2 Second Pair Parts | 第290-297页 |
| 7.5 Summary | 第297-298页 |
| Chapter Eight Conclusion | 第298-304页 |
| 8.1 Major Findings | 第298-301页 |
| 8.2 Contributions and Implications | 第301-302页 |
| 8.3 Limitations and Future Research | 第302-304页 |
| Bibliography | 第304-333页 |
| Appendix I Transcription Notations | 第333-334页 |
| Appendix II English Transcriptions | 第334-373页 |
