| 摘要 | 第1-6页 |
| Abstract | 第6-11页 |
| Part 1 Introduction | 第11-17页 |
| ·An Introduction to the Authors and Their Works Involved | 第11-14页 |
| ·Similar life experiences of Tennessee Williams and Shen Congwen | 第11-13页 |
| ·Similar elements in Tennessee Williams’ and Shen Congwen’s works | 第13-14页 |
| ·Motivation of This Thesis | 第14-16页 |
| ·Significance of This Thesis | 第16-17页 |
| ·Theoretical significance | 第16页 |
| ·Practical significance | 第16-17页 |
| Part 2 Theoretical Framework and Related Literature | 第17-28页 |
| ·Theoretical Framework | 第17-23页 |
| ·A brief introduction to feminist criticism | 第17-22页 |
| ·Main concepts of feminist criticism | 第22-23页 |
| ·Literature Review | 第23-28页 |
| ·Research made abroad and at home on Williams’ works | 第23-25页 |
| ·Research made abroad and at home on Shen Congwen’s works | 第25-28页 |
| Part 3 Method | 第28-29页 |
| ·Qualitative Study on the Two Literary Works | 第28页 |
| ·Parallel Study on the Two Literary Works | 第28-29页 |
| Part 4 Exploration of Laura and Emerald from Feminist Perspective | 第29-47页 |
| ·Analysis of Laura from Feminist Perspective | 第29-37页 |
| ·Existence as a misfit | 第29-34页 |
| ·Existence as a listener | 第34-37页 |
| ·Analysis of Emerald from Feminist Perspective | 第37-47页 |
| ·Loss of discourse power | 第38-42页 |
| ·Escapist from reality | 第42-47页 |
| Part 5 Comparison between Laura and Emerald | 第47-61页 |
| ·Similarities between Laura and Emerald | 第47-58页 |
| ·Personal defects—escapism and dependence | 第47-50页 |
| ·Social and cultural milieu—“the other” in the patriarchal society | 第50-58页 |
| ·Differences between Laura and Emerald | 第58-61页 |
| Conclusion | 第61-64页 |
| Summary | 第61-62页 |
| Limitations and Further Research | 第62-64页 |
| Bibliography | 第64-67页 |
| Published Paper | 第67-68页 |
| Acknowledgements | 第68页 |
