首页--语言、文字论文--常用外国语论文--英语论文--语文教学论文

从情状体假设看中国学生英语进行体的使用

摘要第6-8页
Abstract第8-9页
Chapter One Introduction第13-19页
    1.1 Research Background第13-14页
    1.2 Necessity for Conducting the Research第14-15页
    1.3 Research Questions第15-16页
    1.4 Significance of the Research第16-17页
    1.5 Layout of the research第17-19页
Chapter Two Theoretical Background of Aspect Hypothesis and Relevant Studies第19-34页
    2.1 Definition of Tense第19-20页
    2.2 Definition of Aspect第20-26页
        2.2.1 Grammatical Aspect第21-23页
        2.2.2 Lexical Aspect and Its Classification第23-26页
    2.3 Aspect Hypothesis第26-34页
        2.3.1 Introduction of Aspect Hypothesis第26-27页
        2.3.2 Relevant Studies of Aspect Hypothesis第27-34页
            2.3.2.1 Researches on Testing the Aspect Hypothesis第28-30页
            2.3.2.2 Researches on the Correlation of Aspect Hypothesis and Learners'_Proficiency Level第30-34页
Chapter Three Methodology第34-39页
    3.1 Participants第34页
    3.2 Instruments第34-36页
        3.2.1 English Writing Test第34-35页
        3.2.2 Close Test第35-36页
    3.3 Administration of the Tests第36页
    3.4 Data Collection第36-37页
        3.4.1 Data Collection of Writing第37页
        3.4.2 Data Collection of Cloze Test第37页
    3.5 Statistical Analysis of the Data第37-39页
Chapter Four Results and Discussion第39-56页
    4.1 Progressive Verb Use of Two Proficiency Levels第39-45页
        4.1.1 Use of Different Categories of Verbs by High Proficiency Level第40-42页
        4.1.2 Use of Different Categories of Verbs by Low Proficiency Level第42-44页
        4.1.3 Discussion of Progressive Verb Use of Two Proficiency Levels第44-45页
    4.2 Incorrect Progressive Markings of Two Proficiency Levels第45-51页
        4.2.1 Incorrect Progressive Markings of High Proficiency Level第46-48页
            4.2.1.1 Incorrect Progressive Markings in Writing第46-47页
            4.2.1.2 Incorrect Progressive Markings in Cloze Test第47-48页
        4.2.2 Incorrect Progressive Markings of Low Proficiency Level第48-50页
            4.2.2.1 Incorrect Progressive Markings in Writing第48-49页
            4.2.2.2 Incorrect Progressive Markings in Cloze Test第49-50页
        4.2.3 Discussions of Incorrect Progressive Markings of Two Proficiency Levels第50-51页
    4.3 Relationship between the Effect of Aspect Hypothesis in Cloze Test and Proficiency Level第51-56页
Chapter Five Conclusion第56-60页
    5.1 Summary of Major Findings第56-57页
    5.2 Implications第57-59页
        5.2.1 Theoretical Implications第57-58页
        5.2.2 Pedagogical Implications第58-59页
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research第59-60页
        5.3.1 Limitations of This Thesis第59页
        5.3.2 Suggestions for Future Research第59-60页
Acknowledgements第60-61页
Bibliography第61-66页
Appendix 1: Cloze Test and Writing第66-70页
Appendix 2:Test for Aspectual Categories第70-72页
Article Published during MA Study第72页

论文共72页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:罗西尼《塞密拉米德》在西方歌剧史流程中的意义和价值
下一篇:太仓市社区老年人群轻度认知功能障碍的调查与分析