| 摘要 | 第4-5页 |
| Abstract | 第5页 |
| Abbreviations | 第6-12页 |
| Chapter 1 Introduction | 第12-28页 |
| 1.1 Overview | 第12-15页 |
| 1.2 Background to the Study | 第15-17页 |
| 1.3 Problem Statement | 第17-19页 |
| 1.4 The Objective of the Study | 第19页 |
| 1.5 Research Question | 第19页 |
| 1.6 Research Methodology | 第19-20页 |
| 1.7 The Significance of The Study | 第20-21页 |
| 1.8 Literature Review | 第21-26页 |
| 1.9 Organization of The Thesis | 第26-28页 |
| Chapter 2 Electronic Commerce in A Nutshell | 第28-46页 |
| 2.1 Concepts and Definition | 第28-30页 |
| 2.2 The History of E-commerce | 第30-33页 |
| 2.3 Characteristics of E-Commerce | 第33-34页 |
| 2.4 Categories of E-Commerce | 第34-38页 |
| 2.4.1 Business-to-Consumer (B2C) | 第35-36页 |
| 2.4.2 Business-to-Business (B2B) | 第36-37页 |
| 2.4.3 Consumer-to-Consumer or Peer-to-Peer (C2C/P2P) | 第37页 |
| 2.4.4 Consumer-to-Busines (C2B) | 第37页 |
| 2.4.5 Business-to-Administration(B2A) | 第37-38页 |
| 2.4.6 Consumer-to-Administration (C2A) | 第38页 |
| 2.5 Disputes in E-Commerce | 第38-41页 |
| 2.5.1 Types of E-Commerce Disputes | 第39-41页 |
| 2.6 General Overview of Jurisdiction | 第41-46页 |
| 2.6.1 Jurisdiction to prescribe | 第42-43页 |
| 2.6.2 Jurisdiction to Adjudicate | 第43-44页 |
| 2.6.3 Jurisdiction to Enforce | 第44-46页 |
| Chapter 3 Legal Practices of Jurisdiction in E-Commerce Disputes in the US and the EU | 第46-70页 |
| 3.1 U. S. Tests Employed in Determining Jurisdiction in E-Commerce Disputes | 第46-54页 |
| 3.1.1 Overview of Personal Jurisdiction | 第46-49页 |
| 3.1.2 Zippo Test | 第49-51页 |
| 3.1.3 Effects Test | 第51-52页 |
| 3.1.4 Targeting Test | 第52-53页 |
| 3.1.5 Defects of the U.S Approach | 第53-54页 |
| 3.2 E. U's Rules Adopted in Determining Jurisdiction in E-Commerce Disputes | 第54-70页 |
| 3.2.1 The Brussels Convention | 第56-57页 |
| 3.2.2 The BrusselsⅠ Regulation | 第57-60页 |
| 3.2.3 The Rome Ⅱ Regulation | 第60-61页 |
| 3.2.4 The Choice of Court Clause | 第61-69页 |
| 3.2.5 The weakness of The EU Approach | 第69-70页 |
| Chapter 4 International Attempts to Determine Jurisdiction in Cross-Border E-Commerce Disputes Resolution | 第70-81页 |
| 4.1 Overview | 第70-71页 |
| 4.2 Difficulty of a Hybrid Approach to Jurisdictional Issues in Cross-border E-commerce Disputes | 第71-73页 |
| 4.3 The Dissimilar Ideological Attitudes between the US and EU | 第73页 |
| 4.4 Some International Organization Stance on Jurisdiction to Adjudicate Dispute in Cross-Border E-Commerce Disputes | 第73-76页 |
| 4.4.1 The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) | 第74页 |
| 4.4.2 The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) | 第74-75页 |
| 4.4.3 World Trade Organization (WTO) | 第75页 |
| 4.4.4 World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) | 第75-76页 |
| 4.5 The Hague Convention | 第76-81页 |
| 4.5.1 Over-all Principles of The Hague Convention | 第77-78页 |
| 4.5.2 Electronic Contracts Under The Hague Convention | 第78-81页 |
| Chapter 5 Recommendations, Summary and Conclusion | 第81-89页 |
| 5.1 Recommendations | 第81-84页 |
| 5.1.1 Adoption of the Targeting Approach at the international level | 第81-82页 |
| 5.1.2 Ratification and Modernization of international Conventions and National law respectively to suit international standard | 第82-83页 |
| 5.1.3 Choice of Jurisdictional Clause in an Electronic form should be included in the E-commerce Contracts | 第83页 |
| 5.1.4 Adoption of Online Disputes Resolution and Implementation of International Model Convention on Online Disputes Resolution | 第83-84页 |
| 5.2 Summary | 第84-87页 |
| 5.3 Conclusion | 第87-89页 |
| Bibliography | 第89-100页 |
| Acknowledgement | 第100页 |
