首页--文化、科学、教育、体育论文--信息与知识传播论文--信息与传播理论论文--信息资源及其管理论文

发展中国家中的信息系统外包的风险管理模型--以东非共同体为例

费尔伯特博士学位论文答辩委员会成员名单第5-6页
DEDICATION第6-7页
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS第7-15页
LIST OF ACRONYMS第15-16页
ABSTRACT第16-18页
摘要第19-21页
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION第21-35页
    1.1 Definition and history of outsourcing第24-26页
    1.2 Research problems, objectives and questions第26-28页
    1.3 Methodology and research roadmap第28-30页
    1.4 Research process第30-31页
    1.5 Innovations and contributions第31-33页
    1.6 Organization of the dissertation第33-34页
    1.7 Summary第34-35页
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW第35-61页
    2.1 Information systems outsourcing第36-44页
    2.2 Theoretical framework第44-49页
    2.3 The provider selection problem第49-52页
    2.4 Data sources and collection第52-60页
    2.5 Summary第60-61页
CHAPTER 3 RISK MANAGEMENT MODEL FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS OUTSOURCING第61-94页
    3.1 Overview of risk management第61-63页
    3.2 Risk management for information systems outsourcing第63-77页
        3.2.1 Offshore information systems outsourcing provider selection第70-73页
        3.2.2 Risk management model for offshore IS outsourcing based on provider selection第73-77页
    3.3 Research methodology第77-92页
        3.3.1 An overview of research methods第77-79页
        3.3.2 The PROMETHEE methodology第79-92页
            3.3.2.1 Overview of multi-criteria decision making methods第79-84页
            3.3.2.2 A description of the PROMETHEE methods第84-92页
    3.4 Current trends and future research in information systems outsourcing risk management第92-93页
    3.5 Summary第93-94页
CHAPTER 4 INFORMATION SYSTEMS OUTSOURCING PROVIDER SELECTION IN EAC USING PROMETHEE第94-177页
    4.1 The East African Community region第94-96页
    4.2 IS outsourcing in the East African Community第96-99页
    4.3 Case Study 1: Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries as IS outsourcing providers based on their NRI for a period of 5 years using PROMETHEE methods第99-135页
        4.3.1 Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries for the year 2012第100-103页
            4.3.1.1 Evaluation table第100页
            4.3.1.2 Evaluation results第100-103页
        4.3.2 Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries for the year 2013第103-107页
            4.3.2.1 Evaluation table第103-104页
            4.3.2.2 Evaluation results第104-107页
        4.3.3 Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries for the year 2014第107-109页
            4.3.3.1 Evaluation table第107页
            4.3.3.2 Evaluation results第107-109页
        4.3.4 Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries for the year 2015第109-112页
            4.3.4.1 Evaluation table第110页
            4.3.4.2 Evaluation results第110-112页
        4.3.5 Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries for the year 2016第112-116页
            4.3.5.1 Evaluation table第112-113页
            4.3.5.2 Evaluation results第113-116页
        4.3.6 Evaluating the readiness of EAC countries for a combined period of 5 years (2012-2016)第116-135页
            4.3.6.1 Evaluation table data第116-118页
            4.3.6.2 Preference flows values第118页
            4.3.6.3 PROMETHEE I ranking第118-119页
            4.3.6.4 PROMETHEE II ranking第119-120页
            4.3.6.5 PROMETHEE rainbow第120-122页
            4.3.6.6 Sensitivity analysis (2012-2016): Walking weights and visual stability interval第122-134页
                4.3.6.6.1 Sensitivity analysis: political and regulatory environment (Year: 2012-2016)第123-125页
                4.3.6.6.2 Sensitivity analysis: business and innovation environment (Year: 2012-2016)第125-126页
                4.3.6.6.3 Sensitivity analysis: infrastructure and digital content (Year: 2012-2016)第126-127页
                4.3.6.6.4 Sensitivity analysis: affordability (Year: 2012-2016)第127-128页
                4.3.6.6.5 Sensitivity analysis: skills (Year: 2012-2016)第128-129页
                4.3.6.6.6 Sensitivity analysis: individual usage (Year: 2012-2016)第129-130页
                4.3.6.6.7 Sensitivity analysis: business usage (Year: 2012-2016)第130-131页
                4.3.6.6.8 Sensitivity analysis: government usage (Year: 2012-2016)第131-132页
                4.3.6.6.9 Sensitivity analysis: economic impact (Year: 2012-2016)第132-133页
                4.3.6.6.10 Sensitivity analysis: social impact (Year: 2012-2016)第133-134页
            4.3.6.7 Conclusion第134-135页
    4.4 Case Study 2: Detailed evaluation of the readiness of EAC countries as IS outsourcing providers based on their NRI for the year 2014 using PROMETHEE methods第135-175页
        4.4.1 Networked readiness index of east African countries for the year 2014第137-147页
            4.4.1.1 Burundi第138-140页
            4.4.1.2 Kenya第140-142页
            4.4.1.3 Rwanda第142-144页
            4.4.1.4 Tanzania第144-146页
            4.4.1.5 Uganda第146-147页
        4.4.2 Preference flows第147-149页
        4.4.3 PROMETHEE rankings第149-152页
            4.4.3.1 PROMETHEE I ranking第149-151页
            4.4.3.2 PROMETHEE II ranking第151-152页
        4.4.4 PROMETHEE diamonds第152-153页
        4.4.5 PROMETHEE network第153-155页
        4.4.6 PROMETHEE rainbow第155-157页
        4.4.7 GAIA visual analysis plane第157-163页
            4.4.7.1 General analysis第157-159页
            4.4.7.2 Actions representation in the GAIA plane第159-160页
            4.4.7.3 Criteria representation in the GAIA Plane第160-161页
            4.4.7.4 Interpretation of the actions and criteria representation in the GAIA plane第161-163页
            4.4.7.5 Decision axis第163页
        4.4.8 Sensitivity analysis: Walking weight and visual stability intervals第163-175页
            4.4.8.1 Introduction第163-165页
            4.4.8.2 Sensitivity analysis: political and regulatory environment (Year: 2014)第165-166页
            4.4.8.3 Sensitivity analysis: business and innovation environment (Year: 2014)第166-167页
            4.4.8.4 Sensitivity analysis: infrastructure and digital content (Year: 2014)第167-168页
            4.4.8.5 Sensitivity analysis: affordability (Year: 2014)第168-169页
            4.4.8.6 Sensitivity analysis: skills (Year: 2014)第169-170页
            4.4.8.7 Sensitivity analysis: individual usage (Year: 2014)第170-171页
            4.4.8.8 Sensitivity analysis: business usage (Year: 2014)第171-172页
            4.4.8.9 Sensitivity analysis: government usage (Year: 2014)第172-173页
            4.4.8.10 Sensitivity analysis: economic impact (Year: 2014)第173-174页
            4.4.8.11 Sensitivity analysis: social impact (Year: 2014)第174-175页
    4.5 Summary第175-177页
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS第177-181页
    5.1 Conclusion第177-179页
    5.2 Recommendations第179-181页
REFERENCES第181-195页
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS第195页

论文共195页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:递归神经网络的多稳定性研究
下一篇:群集动力学系统的演化分析与构型控制研究