首页--政治、法律论文--法律论文--中国法律论文--司法制度论文

The Research on Presupposition, Interruption and Equal Rights in Courtroom Discourse

Acknowledgements第4-5页
Abstract第5页
摘要第6-9页
Chapter 1 Introduction第9-14页
    1.1 An overview of forensic linguistics第9-10页
    1.2 Data collection, research methods and expected objectives第10-14页
        1.2.1 The collection and presentation of the data第10-12页
        1.2.2 Research methods第12-13页
        1.2.3 Expected objects第13-14页
Chapter 2 Literature review第14-22页
    2.1 An overview of courtroom discourse第14-18页
        2.1.1 An overview of courtroom discourse abroad第14-16页
        2.1.2 An overview of courtroom discourse in China第16-18页
    2.2 Courtroom discourse and power第18-22页
        2.2.1 The introduction to power第18页
        2.2.2 Discourse power第18-22页
Chapter 3 Theoretic framework第22-27页
    3.1 An introduction to presupposition theory第22-24页
        3.1.1 The definition of presupposition第22-23页
        3.1.2 The classification of presupposition第23页
        3.1.3 The research range of presupposition theory第23-24页
    3.2 An introduction to interruption第24-25页
        3.2.1 The definition of interruption第24-25页
        3.2.2 The research field of interruption第25页
        3.2.3 The places and causes of interruption第25页
    3.3 Reasons to choose presupposition and interruption as the framework第25-27页
Chapter 4 Speech manners and features in court trials第27-39页
    4.1 Speech manners of the participants in court trials第27-32页
        4.1.1 Questioning and answering第27-29页
        4.1.2 Making statements第29-30页
        4.1.3 Debating第30-31页
        4.1.4 Giving directions第31页
        4.1.5 Making declarations第31-32页
    4.2 Speech features of the participants in court trials第32-38页
        4.2.1 Speech features of the judge第32-34页
        4.2.2 Speech features of the prosecutor/lawyer第34-36页
        4.2.3 Speech features of the defendant第36-37页
        4.2.4 Speech features of the witness第37-38页
    4.3 Summary第38-39页
Chapter 5 Realization of equal rights in courtroom discourse第39-60页
    5.1 Realization of equal rights through breaking presuppositions第39-50页
        5.1.1 Through breaking semantic presupposition第39-47页
        5.1.2 Through breaking pragmatic presupposition第47-50页
    5.2 Realization of equal rights through decreasing improper interruptions第50-60页
        5.2.1 Through decreasing judge’s improper interruption第51-56页
            5.2.1.1 Defendant interrupted by the judge第51-54页
            5.2.1.2 Lawyers interrupted by the judge第54-55页
            5.2.1.3 Witness interrupted by the judge第55-56页
            5.2.1.4 Summary第56页
        5.2.2 Through decreasing the prosecutor’s improper interruption第56-59页
            5.2.2.1 Defendant interrupted by the prosecutor第56-57页
            5.2.2.2 Witness interrupted by the prosecutor第57-58页
            5.2.2.3 Summary第58-59页
        5.2.3 Through decreasing the lawyer’s improper interruption第59-60页
Chapter 6 Conclusions第60-64页
    6.1 The summary第60页
    6.2 The possible inspirations第60-62页
    6.3 The imperfection and suggestions第62-64页
Bibliography第64-67页

论文共67页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:河北省体育教育专业2005级本科毕业生求职情况的调查研究
下一篇:Foreign Language Anxiety and Pedagogical Implications