首页--文学论文

在无望中寻找希望--《赎罪》叙事判断

Abstract第3-4页
摘要第5-7页
Contents第7-9页
Introduction第9-15页
Chapter One The Theory of Phelan's Narrative Judgments第15-22页
    1.1 The Development of Narrative Judgments第15-16页
    1.2 Three Types of Narrative Judgments第16页
    1.3 Seven Theses of Narrative Judgments第16-22页
Chapter Two Innocent or Guilty: Judgments in Briony's misidentification第22-31页
    2.1 Interpretive Judgments in Briony第22-25页
        2.1.1 Briony's Own Interpretive Judgments第23-24页
        2.1.2 Readers' Interpretive Judgment第24-25页
    2.2 Ethical Judgments in Briony第25-28页
        2.2.1 Briony's Ethical Judgment to Robbie第26页
        2.2.2 Readers' Ethical Judgment to Briony第26-28页
    2.3 Aesthetical Judgment in Part One第28-31页
        2.3.1 Internal Focalization of Briony and the Readers' Aesthetical Judgment第28-31页
Chapter Three Atoning Sincerely or Seeking the Pleasure of Atonement: Judgments of Briony's Effort to Atone第31-39页
    3.1 Interpretive Judgment第31-32页
    3.2 Ethical Judgment第32-34页
    3.3 Aesthetical Judgment第34-39页
        3.3.1 The Relationship between Fiction and Reality---Unreliable Narration in Atonement第34-36页
        3.3.2 Fiction or Reality of Her Atonement第36-39页
Chapter four Hopeful or Hopeless Atonement: Judgments on McEwan's Deception第39-47页
    4.1 Interpretive Judgment第40-41页
    4.2 Ethical Judgment第41-43页
    4.3 Aesthetical Judgment第43-47页
        4.3.1 Metaficitional Feature of Atonement第43-45页
        4.3.2 Hopeful or Hopeless Atonement by Writing第45-47页
Conclusion第47-49页
Acknowledgements第49-50页
Bibliography第50-53页
在读期间公开发表论文(著)及科研请况第53页

论文共53页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:王勃文研究
下一篇:生态批评中的“地方”理论研究