首页--文学论文

《大地》文学评论的论辩结构分析

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS第6-7页
ABSTRACT第7-8页
摘要第9-14页
Chapter One INTRODUCTION第14-18页
    1.1 Research Background第14-15页
    1.2 Significance and Purposes of the Research第15页
    1.3 Research Methodology and Scope of the Research第15-17页
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis第17-18页
Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW第18-30页
    2.1 An Overview of Argumentation第18-23页
        2.1.1 The development of argumentation第18-19页
        2.1.2 Major perspectives of argumentation studies第19-21页
        2.1.3 Previous studies on Aristotle’s argumentation theories第21-22页
        2.1.4 Previous studies on Toulmin’s argumentation theories第22-23页
    2.2 An Overview of Literary Reviews第23-25页
        2.2.1 Introduction to literary reviews第23页
        2.2.2 Major approaches to studying literary reviews第23页
        2.2.3 Previous studies on literary reviews第23-25页
    2.3 An Overview of Pearl S. Buck’s The Good Earth第25-29页
        2.3.1 Introduction to The Good Earth第26页
        2.3.2 Major angles of studying The Good Earth第26页
        2.3.3 Previous studies on The Good Earth第26-29页
    2.4 Summary第29-30页
Chapter Three THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK第30-38页
    3.1 Aristotle’s Argumentation Theories第30-33页
        3.1.1 Syllogism第30-32页
        3.1.2 Enthymeme第32-33页
    3.2 Toulmin’s Argumentation Model第33-36页
        3.2.1 Toulmin’s basic layout of argumentation第33-34页
        3.2.2 Toulmin’s advanced layout of argumentation第34-36页
    3.3 Argumentative ways第36-38页
        3.3.1 Logos appeal第36页
        3.3.2 Ethos appeal第36-37页
        3.3.3 Pathos appeal第37-38页
Chapter Four Analysis of Argumentation Structure in Literary Reviews of The Good Earth第38-57页
    4.1 Analysis of Literary Reviews Based on Aristotle’s Argumentation Theories第38-48页
        4.1.1 Example analyses based on syllogism第38-42页
        4.1.2 Example analyses based on enthymeme第42-47页
        4.1.3 Argumentative ways used in literary reviews第47-48页
    4.2 Studies on Literary Reviews Based on Toulmin’s Argumentation Model第48-57页
        4.2.1 Example analyses based on Toulmin’s argumentation model第48-56页
        4.2.2 Argumentative ways used in literary reviews第56-57页
Chapter Five CONCLUSION第57-60页
    5.1 Major Findings第57-58页
    5.2 Implications of the Research第58-59页
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Study第59-60页
REFERENCES第60-66页
APPENDIX 作者在攻读硕士学位期间发表的论文的目录第66页

论文共66页,点击 下载论文
上一篇:概念隐喻视角下《喜福会》女性角色分析
下一篇:女性形象的意象图式解读--以凯特·肖邦的《觉醒》和《智胜神明》为例